Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BY or CJ


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Like sure CJ threw more interceptions than bryce against the same defense but they also managed to score more points and get past the fifty yard line more than once.

18/30 150 yards 1 TD isn’t the flex bryce defenders think it is. 

Thats why his performance was especially terrible because if he doesn’t melt down and throw 4 picks they 100% win that game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, AceMan said:

I put them both on the same level.  CJ is currently at 'Bryce's benching' stage though so BY is technically above him right now.

My goodness 2023 was a horrible year to draft a QB though!!

that game was snowing cold windy and cj handled those conditions terribly..  but he still was way way way above byoung in every category pretty much in 2025 y/g y/p qbr and passer rating not even close

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, AceMan said:

I put them both on the same level.  CJ is currently at 'Bryce's benching' stage though so BY is technically above him right now.

My goodness 2023 was a horrible year to draft a QB though!!

The risk you take when trading up, which I’ve never wanted to do.

But Tepper was going to land on Levis without a trade up, so I’m more than skeptical that any of the 2024 blue-chippers would’ve been chosen a year later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hindsight being 20/20, we just went all in on the wrong QB class. We would've been far better off investing all those assets we spent elsewhere.

But as we've seen, unless it's a Peyton Manning, there really is no sure number 1. You're better off taking your QB where you sit or trading up a spot. Moving up to 8 spots to number 1 is just too costly in terms of picks and the ability to build around that QB. 

This is also why you should always be trying to develop in the backup role instead of settling for a Dalton type player. There are no guarantees and the more shots you take, the more chances you have of finding your guy or a bridge guy until you find THE guy. 

Or, you get some dumb ass team to trade a small fortune for your number 1 overall pick and take your QB with the 1st overall that they traded to you as part of the package because they were so impatient. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Texans have badly botched their situation on offense. They had an awful OL in 2024 so what do they do? They trade the one player on the OL that was good (Laremy Tunsil) and fire the O.C. who was helping Stroud develop into a good QB.

C.J. Stroud looked absolutely broken yesterday. Like he just wanted the game to be over with.

Maybe Ryans was threatened by Bobby Slowik? That could explain why he gutted the offense and redirected all the resources into "his" side of the ball on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see both sides of the arguments, but compared to last year we're somehow at an upgrade over completely fried Dalton and wasn't even good in college Plummer. At least Pickett and Grier probably have some desire to make more money when Dalton was happy to just go through the motions and I will never understand why they even bothered with Plummer. 
    • After watching Dan for 3 yrs now, I think I understand his plan. It’s a simple plan that should work for the long run.     I saw some of this last yr. Dan wants a vet and a young player at each position. I really think we go OT if one they like there. Moton is aging, Icky will not be back until 27, if ever. We need to get ahead of the tackle problem 
    • You are just stressing too much about these particular positions. You want to upgrade from Bryce and I understand that but you aren’t going to really get that without getting into a bidding war for a QB2 potential QB1 like Willis. You could possibly trade for Mills or the backup for Chicago but they are still gambles and their teams will won’t decent picks.  Again the Eagles thought KP was a capable enough backup to trade for him once their backup was hurt and won a Super Bowl with him as QB2. The point is most teams aren’t rolling with some stud QB2/3 that is going to push even a bottom tier starter. They are better off the building their roster in other areas. The Rams are rolling with Bennett right now as QB2 for example.  The goal is winning absolutely. We overachieved last year even with stumbling into the playoffs. Another year and this staff needs to take the next step in building a team. Will Grier has little to no impact on that….
×
×
  • Create New...