Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Welp... Shaq vs Dickson....

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Have a feeling Dicksin doesnt make the team

That would require someone else doing better. It is difficult to look at one play in which we don't really know what we are looking for exactly and know how he stacks up overall against the other options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, KillerKat said:

Ok I see the "QB" in the drill now. He blended in with the white shirt. Looks like Dickson though did what he was supposed to. Shaq was driven to the outside and way past the QB.

My thought as well, though it's ugly.  There's also a clip in the longer video where Dickson is flat out holding TD during his rush. Not a great drill for Ed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheMostInterestingMan Mentor

TheMostInterestingMan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

Shaq will be one a game breaker. I would not be surprised if Shaq makes a case for best LB ahead of Kuechly this year or next. When TD is the 3rd best LB on the team, you know that unit is going to dominate on every level of the defense.

"Look at me! Look at my shock value! 

 

... Luke is the best defender in the entire league. It's one thing to be excited about Shaq, but common dude. You are just embarrassing yourself. Sheesh. We've hardly even even seen Shaq play

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CoastalCat Newbie

CoastalCat

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Poor Dickson ends up way out of frame.... Shaq is pure beast.

 

I think I saw one on the Panthers website that (I think) was Marcus Lucas being eaten alive by Colin Jones on a blitz pickup drill. That kid might be toast this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cuttinedge Proficient

Cuttinedge

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, csx said:

That would require someone else doing better. It is difficult to look at one play in which we don't really know what we are looking for exactly and know how he stacks up overall against the other options.

Dicksons blitz pickup in the super bowl is enough tape to cut him.  

But yes we do need a upgrade at TE#2 hope sandlands the answer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...