Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jerry Richardson riot reaction was "damn near criminal"?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

IDK, maybe JRich should be/is more than just a rich guy with an office downtown... There are countless instances of him using his power and money to effect positivity. Meanwhile we're stuck with poo like this....an elected NC congressman voices his views clearly: "They hate white people, because white people are successful and they're not".

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/22/gop-congressman-north-carolina-protesters-hate-white-people/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those kinds of articles are part of the downfall of civil discourse in our culture.

It's easy to make some click-bait title, rant wildly, hit the publish button and watch the clicks and ad revenue come in.  There is ZERO journalism with much of the internet press.  Many of them are jerks with keyboards and a wordpress blog.

As Panther fans we know JR and the Panthers organization.  I think TD and Olsen said it really well in their press conferences.  We're not Baltimore, we're Charlotte, NC.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

So you make it look like JR called them criminal? Was it the writer that said it?

Yes.  Jerry said it.  And there is nothing "damn near" about it.  He showing restraint and was much to kind.  Peaceful protest is one thing, but once you pick up a rock and throw it you've crossed the line to criminal.  Rioting is criminal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...