Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Defense - Individual stats through week 2


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2017 Carolina Panthers individual stats through week 2 including QB pressures. 

PLAYER TOTAL SOLO ASSIST SACKS QBP FF FR INT
Davis 16 12 4 1 1 - - -
Kuechly 15 10 5 - 2 1 - 1
Worley 12 10 2 - - - - -
Coleman 11 10 1 - - - - -
Bradberry 10 9 1 - - - - -
Adams 9 7 2 - - - - -
Addison 6 6 0 1 5 - - -
Peppers 7 5 2 2.5 2 - - -
Lotulelei 6 4 2 0.5 - - 1 -
Thompson 6 4 2 1 - - - -
Short 5 3 2 - 6 - - -
Horton 3 2 1 1 2 1 - -
Johnson 3 3 0 - 1 - - -
Love 2 1 1 - 2 - - -
Butler 1 0 1 - - - - -
Munnerlyn 1 1 0 - - - - -

 

Items of interest

Addison and Short make up over half of all QB pressures. 

Julius Peppers leads sack totals. 

Thomas Davis leading in solo and total tackles. 

Luke with the only INT - (I suspect that changes this Sunday)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CJ isn't being paid too much this year is he? He's definitely on the downswing of his career and his body began breaking down a few seasons back. Still quality depth to have on the team. Can't hate the guy too much because I really haven't seen him out there that much.

Addison has been balling out hard though, good on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care if we suffer a little during the regular season, we need to rest Davis during games and get Thompson more snaps. Davis is on an All-Pro track but I don't believe it's possible to keep that up for an entire season. He needs to be full strength if/when we get to the playoffs. And we have a more than capable backup sitting on the sideline for 50% of the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any numbers of passes defensed? Knock downs are almost as important as INTs.

How about tackles for losses? For some of these guys, they are really shining at it this year. We've held two first rate running backs to basically nothing performances.

Edit to add: Big props to Worley for upping his game considerably!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not even a particularly nuanced opinion, yet it seems out of reach for so many.
    • I don’t think he can be great. For me he tops out as starter maybe make the playoffs, stuff like that. I would have been okay with that kind of player as a placeholder but you don’t invest the time and assets we did and be happy with that.  On the cure,If a guy has mechanical flaws but otherwise is enticing, you let someone else make the mistake of taking him in the top of the 1st. If he doesn’t get taken you can pick him up 2nd or 3rd day and try to develop him (off the bench not starting).  The risk/reward with Bryce was horribly misjudged. I didn’t want to trade like that in the first place because I didn’t see the generation talent that justifies that type of move, but once it was done CJ was the better gamble. No doubt. 
    • That's what I mean. If you claim to possess some super knowledge about the QB position from a previous non-football but football related job, wouldn't you want to expound upon that to support this "everyone doesn't know anything about being a QB" thesis? The rest is just summed up by stating that there are a lot of variables to a QB being successful. Yeah....I mean that isn't earth shattering.  While there is certainly a lot of luck involved in all manners of success, consistent success with the variables around you also changing on a regular basis is usually fairly conclusive.  Is Trent Dilfer the same as Tom Brady? Is Nick Foles the same as Patrick Mahomes? I supposed based on the OP's arguments, they are. That's not really the way it turned out, however.  The NFL isn't unlike most other jobs or even other sports. The cream typically does rise to the top on a more consistent basis. Is it accidental that premier poker players seem to win or perform very well on a consistent basis, give that any individual hand is largely luck?  
×
×
  • Create New...