Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Anderson says Panthers didn’t do anything wrong


TN05

Recommended Posts

Quote

Last spring, Anderson joined the Panthers under the impression — as was the coaching staff — that he would be used in tandem with starting running back/receiver Christian McCaffrey. But Anderson rarely saw the field while McCaffrey blew up, rushing for 1,098 yards on 219 carries and catching 107 passes for 867 yards.

”When I got to Carolina, it was a one-two punch, me and Christian McCaffrey,” he said. “He ended up emerging. ... (Being complementary) was supposed to happen, and it didn’t. 

“But Carolina didn’t do anything wrong. They brought me in (before releasing me) and told me that right in my face. They respect me enough as a player to keep it real with me and what went on, and what went wrong. And that’s fine.” 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

CMC is awesome but i still think it's a reflection of the coaching staff that they couldn't figure out how to use a guy like CJ to make a positive impact on the offense. running CMC into the ground just seems spectacularly short-sighted.

I originally thought so, too, but I am coming to a different understanding of the long game. You have to look past this season and the cap implications.

Had CJ worked out here and actually taken to the RB2 position (or even won the RB1 position) there's going to be not just one but multiple sturdy paychecks headed his way. We could literally have worked ourselves into a situation like we had with Stephen Davis and DeShaun Foster, or even worse, like Williams and Stewart. Two sizeable or two huge paychecks each season. That just doesn't fly and even if you can talk a non-bench player into vet minimums (not going to happen), each year that vet minimum gets larger and larger.

Running backs, good ones, are starting to command a premium on the market again and retaining them gets expensive. So how do you get good ones? You draft them, like CMC, and run them until the tread wears off and their rookie contracts expire. Let them roll out the door at four years or extend them at a team friendly number for the fifth. By the end of that fifth season, they start hitting that spot where the price tag goes up and crosses over the falling arc of injury and capability.

The league is going to be getting younger, quickly, as a way to combat the skyrocketing costs of star players versus the cap. The success of a number of young QBs on rookie contracts right now has to be something that a number of teams have to be eyeing closely. (Imagine what the Giants and Chargers are thinking when they cut those massive checks for their QBs, much less the Packers and Saints.) Heck, Nick Foles will come with a $20 million cap hit this season... as a premier backup.

Running backs are the same and wide receivers will eventually get there, too. CJ was released because he didn't work with our long term plans and we really weren't working with his. The guy fell into the best situation possible for him with Gurley having to sit out a couple of games. Will they retain him? Probably not for more than an extra season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Dex said:

We made the right call.

Wholeheartedly disagree. I look no further than to the failures on 3rd and 4th and short, in particular in the Seattle game, when CJ could have been utilized to get short yardage 1st downs. It was so wildly frustrating to see the Panthers cut a talented veteran back and struggle in key situations where he could have helped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I originally thought so, too, but I am coming to a different understanding of the long game. You have to look past this season and the cap implications.

Had CJ worked out here and actually taken to the RB2 position (or even won the RB1 position) there's going to be not just one but multiple sturdy paychecks headed his way. We could literally have worked ourselves into a situation like we had with Stephen Davis and DeShaun Foster, or even worse, like Williams and Stewart. Two sizeable or two huge paychecks each season. That just doesn't fly and even if you can talk a non-bench player into vet minimums (not going to happen), each year that vet minimum gets larger and larger.

Running backs, good ones, are starting to command a premium on the market again and retaining them gets expensive. So how do you get good ones? You draft them, like CMC, and run them until the tread wears off and their rookie contracts expire. Let them roll out the door at four years or extend them at a team friendly number for the fifth. By the end of that fifth season, they start hitting that spot where the price tag goes up and crosses over the falling arc of injury and capability.

The league is going to be getting younger, quickly, as a way to combat the skyrocketing costs of star players versus the cap. The success of a number of young QBs on rookie contracts right now has to be something that a number of teams have to be eyeing closely. (Imagine what the Giants and Chargers are thinking when they cut those massive checks for their QBs, much less the Packers and Saints.) Heck, Nick Foles will come with a $20 million cap hit this season... as a premier backup.

Running backs are the same and wide receivers will eventually get there, too. CJ was released because he didn't work with our long term plans and we really weren't working with his. The guy fell into the best situation possible for him with Gurley having to sit out a couple of games. Will they retain him? Probably not for more than an extra season. 

This whole post is one big nope.

Giving CJ a few carries a game != any sort of big pay day whatsoever.

There was no situation with Davis and Foster aside from the usual Panther nonsense. Foster had one good run and otherwise had 11 TDs and less rushing yards than good backs get in 3 seasons. 

Same with Stewart and Williams that wasn't a situation that was a usual Panthers failure of not releasing Williams.

Good teams don't have these 'problems' and the Rams won't either, your post acts like you have to pay a RB just because they do good in spot duty like it's mandatory and mandated from the league lol...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Wholeheartedly disagree. I look no further than to the failures on 3rd and 4th and short, in particular in the Seattle game, when CJ could have been utilized to get short yardage 1st downs. It was so wildly frustrating to see the Panthers cut a talented veteran back and struggle in key situations where he could have helped.

That's fair. I just think that part of CMC's success is making sure he gets enough touches. Just not enough to go around to a top tier back like Anderson. Didn't seem fair to him.

Value > Effectiveness?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leadership was stupid to not use him. Even dumber to let him go.

But as was mentioned elsewhere, Anderson has no reason to be upset. He's on a Super Bowl team and we're sitting at home.

If anything, he has more reason to laugh at the Panthers than be angry at them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...