Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Keys To Victory


The Question

Recommended Posts

Against Houston... 

what are they guys? What’s most important on Sunday?

In my opinion it’s gotta be our D-line... containing Deshaun and putting up the same type of performance as last week. With the secondary in a close second. 
 

Also as a side note question, what kind of performance does Kyle Allen need to put up for us to get the W? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

The Texans were trashed for having a pretty bad offensive line the first couple of weeks, but I saw a story that a little bit of shuffling along the front helped them look a little better last game.

Some of that is just Watson sitting back too long trying to get the home run.  

Hou is going to score on us.  We need to limit Nuk.  Have other guys beat us.  Not sure we can out score them if we let the Nuk/Watson connection get hot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

frustrate JJ Watt by doing a lot of dump offs to CMC on the opposite side of the field. make him have one of his tantrums where he goes over and yells at the coach to line him up on the other side. then start playing the other side after he's ruined the line chemistry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...