Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So is The Run Defense Basically fuged Until the Offseason?


Pantha-kun

Recommended Posts

I'm sure Rivera, Washington, Tepper, and hell the players themselves know they've been turning in some terrible piss poor run defense all season long.

If anything it seems to be getting worse. Rivera has to have tried a multitude of different things to change it and yet the result is still the same. So is this a personnel issue with who is on our Dline? 

Well whatever it is, its frustrating. For so many seasons I was fine with getting blitzkrieged through the air on occasion because I knew we had a stout Run D. But now we have an inconsistent pass rush, no rushing defense, and many DBs often looking lost despite our passing D stats being okay-ish. 

If Rivera's a defensive guy whys the defense stunk for the past 2 years? So many dudes on that line are highly touted , highly drafted, highly paid, or some combination of those three things. This just isn't adding up for me...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically yes. Unless some miracle of communication takes place between the DL and the coaches. They showed its possible, first game they held Gurly in check(yes yes hes not the same, still good). Ive heard Mccoy say Washington been telling they the same things over and over for weeks....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg Cosell broke it down pretty good on FNZ.  Basically our DLine is getting manhandled in the run game and it screws over the entire defense.  Honestly, D Line was supposed to Washington's specialty, but he appears to be failing on all levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

Greg Cosell broke it down pretty good on FNZ.  Basically our DLine is getting manhandled in the run game and it screws over the entire defense.  Honestly, D Line was supposed to Washington's specialty, but he appears to be failing on all levels.

Imagine that. Just like Rick Rodgers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean if there's any portion of a team that can see a quick turnaround its the run defense, but it mandates actually going outside, getting in pads and tackling each other, not hiding in the bubble in shells and giving half the team a "vet day."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
    • Plays aren't designed to go to only one receiver. Qbs go through progressions for a reason. Primary or not the other routes are viable options.
×
×
  • Create New...