Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When it is all said and done, who will have had the better career?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

We haven't really seen anything from Chinn yet, so to pick him at this point is just optimistic wishful thinking. Let's see what he has to offer first! For all of the great expectations for Shaq, he's at least proven that he is a legit NFL-caliber player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m assuming a lot, but I’ll say Chinn.

Shaq’s prime years are almost over and he hasn’t really seen that much playing time.

Chinn will likely start from day one. He’ll prob suck his first year, but he has a ton of time to get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tbe said:

I’m assuming a lot, but I’ll say Chinn.

Shaq’s prime years are almost over and he hasn’t really seen that much playing time.

Chinn will likely start from day one. He’ll prob suck his first year, but he has a ton of time to get better.

Shaq is 26 and does not have the concussion problems that Luke had.  His prime years should be the next 4 or 5.  

I have not even seen Chinn practice so I only know about him from highlights on tape and the combine.

At least I know Shaq is a good solid LB so I would say him until I at least see Chinn play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they even play the same position? Seriously waiting to see how they play Chinn.

The bar for Chinn to pass Shaq is pretty low at this time but both have potential to be good in the new D going forward. I'm hopeing both live up to their potential.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Them playing behind a couple more seasoned guys until they get familiar with coverage and pace of play is a good thing though. We really can use them to spell the other guys, and in situational ball especially with Ransom on possible run/blitzing downs.
    • They fuged him over so bad to help cover their bad judgement. About time he got a little something to wrk with. 
    • I think completion percentage is a bit of a overinflated stat for a qb too. People place to much stock into it. So many factors to consider with it : receivers, how many attempts are made deep, the defense etc all play a roll in it. When it’s considerably low 50% or less the QB accuracy can come into question. But I don’t think it’s necessarily one of the better percentages to put so much importance into for that position. General effectiveness is far more indicative of the QB you have. First downs, 3rd and 4th down conversions, points scored and clutch plays IMO is how you grade a QB. Always bothered the poo out of me how people downed Cam for his completion percentage and that’s what they used to disregard him as an all time great. Dude damn near averaged 3tds to 1 turnover a game and was an obvious difference maker for us.
×
×
  • Create New...