Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper talks Matt Rhule and Marty Hurney


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Tepper spoke a little about both Carolina Panthers head coach Matt Rhule and GM Marty Hurney yesterday. Here is what he had to say. 

 

On Matt Rhule

Quote

Coach Rhule is a disciplined-process (coach), but he also has that old, hard-nosed sort of Pittsburgh deal. He's not from Pittsburgh, but he's from Pennsylvania, not too far away. So I think I appreciate all that about him," Tepper said. "He's a good speaker with you all, but he's also a great communicator with his players, and I really appreciate that."

 

Quote

"He's a great evaluator, a great motivator," Tepper said. "It doesn't hurt, that degree, in how you deal with people, and how you deal with people, particularly this year. So I know it's not something you think about football coaches potentially being smart away from football, or having a master's degree even. But this coach does."

Tepper clearly feels a connection to Rhule based on his home geography. Guys from PA "get" one another.  Matt Rhule has a master's degree in educational psychology, making him not just an expert in teaching but in understanding how people learn. This could explain why every team he has coached has improved greatly in a short amount of time. Will it work at a NFL level? We shall see. 

 

On Marty Hurney's Contract Extension

Quote

 

"There's been too much to do to have those conversations," Tepper said. "You should ask me that question later on.

"Marty and I are very concentrated on doing as much as we can — and obviously coach Rhule — in getting this football team in shape and making sure we keep the players safe and healthy and starting the season. And that's all we care about right now."

 

I'm not sure what to think about no talks happening on Hurney's contract extension. There probably isn't much news here. He still has a year left on his contract. Perhaps 2020's talent evaluation on who he brought in will be a deciding factor on if he stays or goes. In the past, Tepper has alluded to shifting some of the GM's roles to another position. That may still be happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hurney's continued presence is easily the most baffling thing about the Tepper era. We're cleaning house all over the place, yet the GM who got fired previously for tanking the team and couldn't so much as get an interview anywhere else is still here.

With the Panthers being trash this year, the percentage of him being here after the season isn't high, in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

With the Panthers being trash this year, the percentage of him being here after the season isn't high, in my opinion. 

Rhule seems to have the final say on the roster, either way. That’s why we couldn’t get the guy from the Eagles. Think Tepper wants Rhule to have full control early on to see if he can do what he did at Temple and Baylor. It’s the only thing that makes sense out of all of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My hope is that Hurney gets moved to a more appropriate position next season. 

 

perhaps we just didnt like the candidates that were available this offseason and are just holding tight in what is going to be a rebuilding year anyway. 

 

its also a possibility Hurney is just a "GM" by title and matt rhule is calling the personnel shots.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Tepper spoke a little about both Carolina Panthers head coach Matt Rhule and GM Marty Hurney yesterday. Here is what he had to say. 

 

On Matt Rhule

 

Tepper clearly feels a connection to Rhule based on his home geography. Guys from PA "get" one another.  Matt Rhule has a master's degree in educational psychology, making him not just an expert in teaching but in understanding how people learn. This could explain why every team he has coached has improved greatly in a short amount of time. Will it work at a NFL level? We shall see. 

 

On Marty Hurney's Contract Extension

I'm not sure what to think about no talks happening on Hurney's contract extension. There probably isn't much news here. He still has a year left on his contract. Perhaps 2020's talent evaluation on who he brought in will be a deciding factor on if he stays or goes. In the past, Tepper has alluded to shifting some of the GM's roles to another position. That may still be happening. 

Has anyone else been watching that AppleTV show 'Ted Lasso' and seeing parallels with Matt Rhule and the Panthers? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hurney's continued presence is easily the most baffling thing about the Tepper era. We're cleaning house all over the place, yet the GM who got fired previously for tanking the team and couldn't so much as get an interview anywhere else is still here.

It will be hard for me to take this franchise seriously until Hurney is gone. Not demoted, gone.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who has been on this board knows my distaste for Marty Hurney.  I have held this belief long before the end of his first term here, and knew that if given the chance would put this team right back at the top of the draft once again....here we are.

To the folks saying "it's OK, this is Rhule's show now" as a reason to be OK with Marty still lurking around the building...that's NOT a good thing.  That's a really bad thing.  Matt needs to be learning a LOT of stuff right now...contract disputes, comp picks, falling cap, upcoming college prospects, etc.....

That's far too much on a rookie HC, much less one who has never even held so much as a coordinator position in the NFL.

We need a legit GM to help Matt, not a yes man who let's him do his thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper seems really enamored with Rhule's personality. And I get that. He's an extremely charismatic person. Plus, he's accomplished a lot at the college level.

With that said, so did Chip Kelly. And Rhule wasn't facing the highest level of competition where he coached.

It's far from guaranteed that he'll be successful at the NFL level. We all hope that he will, but right now he's still a huge unknown and giving him anything close to full control is very premature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Tepper seems really enamored with Rhule's personality. And I get that. He's an extremely charismatic person. Plus, he's accomplished a lot at the college level.

With that said, so did Chip Kelly. And Rhule wasn't facing the highest level of competition where he coached.

It's far from guaranteed that he'll be successful at the NFL level. We all hope that he will, but right now he's still a huge unknown and giving him anything close to full control is very premature.

Rhule was 2-5 against top 25 teams at Temple. Those two wins were against East Carolina and Navy.

He was 0-11 against top 25 teams at Baylor. 

There's no doubt he turned programs around, but there's no evidence yet that he can actually beat good teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There's nothing wrong with Sanders,  he's a good receiving TE.  Canales just doesn't use the TE that way.  He won't get the looks to break out.  
    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
×
×
  • Create New...