Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions: if Lawrence is gone, what's the plan then?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

First off.. putting the cart before the horse, you just can't play a rookie behind this Oline no matter who it us. That is the biggest problem to solve first. If they some how do a fix by 2021 then what's plan b if they don't get their QB? Keep Bridgewater and draft 2nd best rookie QB? Don't think anyone currently on this roster is starting quality....

What you got?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fields then Lance. 
 

In my opinion we have to take one of the three of those guys even if it means mortgaging future picks. 
 

You have to use some cap to add free agent pieces in the secondary and a good linebacker. 
 

You draft oline in the 2nd and 3rd round. 
 

you roll teddy out there early next year and let the qb learn and then hopefully take over a few games in. 
 

then you ideally compete in 2022 (same time frame as the cardinals are seeing with Murray, the ravens saw with Lamar, and the bills saw with Allen). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lawrence is my preferred choice, I think he's got the highest floor and highest ceiling and is pro ready, but Fields' and Lance's floor and ceiling aren't that much lower than Lawrence's, and they'd be great consolation prizes. Outside of those 3 though, I have zero fuging clue what we would do at QB for the future...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok--I have seen some sample items, and I would like to see something (if possible) measures on field intelligence--maybe how quickly you can grasp a playbook or absorb film session adjustments...Back when we had Morrison as team president and Hurney as GM, I offered to assess (as part of my research in education requirement at a University) emotional intelligence and learning styles of players to help coaches teach more effectively.  Morrison loved it and contacted me about it.  Hurney was not interested, and it fell through the cracks.  My pitch?  If only 50% of first-rounders become successful NFL players and that number drops significantly, can you tell me that you are effectively measuring talent?  Morrison thought it was a good point and wanted to do something that might improve long-term success rates--that would impact the cap management, etc.  Marty, according to Morrison, said he was not interested at this time and if so, he would want a football guy to do it.  (I told Morrison that I played in college and Hurney, a sports reporter at one time, did not. (He told me that Hurney played as a Guard in college--who knew?) Any way, about that time, Morrison left (2017) and the idea was dropped.  I reached back out a year later or so to Marty was still not interested.  A few days later, his wife accused him of assault or something, so I dropped it.
    • Pretty sure they still do the Wonderlic they just don't publicly release the scores.
    • I just thought he was under the radar--but thanks for opening our eyes to him.  I think we should have better measures for intelligence--such as reaction time, angles, etc. Legette is raw as heck, for example, and his RAS was very high.  We used to do the Wonderlic (which was not great) but to know how effectively a player makes on field decisions would be great.  
×
×
  • Create New...