Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who will be the last NFL team to win their 1st game?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

These teams are all still winless 

Jets,Broncos,Bengals,Texans, Giants, Falcons,Eagles, Vikings, and Falcons.

Jets/Broncos play each other this week.

Texans and Vikings platt each other this week 

Bengals play the Jags this week

Giants play the Rams

Eagles play the Niners

Falcons go against the Packers 

Seems like all 4 of these teams are destined for 0-4 after this well 

Giants, Falcons, and the losers of the Broncos/Jets and Texans/Vikings game. 
Seems likely the the Eagles could continue to lose and Bengals May have a shot at a W vs the Jags

If the Jets can’t squeeze out a win against the Broncos their schedule doesn’t ease up until they play the dolphins twice and Browns late in the year. 

The Broncos and Falcons eventually face off so one will have to win bearing a tie.

Bengals eventually play the winless Giants and Texans, plus they’ve still got 2 against the Browns 

At this point I feel fairly confident that Giants May be the last one to win one, their biggest competitor for most losses will likely be the loser of the Broncos/Jets game this Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

Giants. Dave is a horrible GM. Not saying Hurndog is good but DG is just trash. 

for a guy whose gimmick is "hog mollies".....his OLs sure are trash.  I watched the first game of the season and Barkley couldn't even get back to the line of scrimmage.    A joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I'd like to say Atlanta, there's a stink about the Jets that just can't be overlooked. They might just be 2008 Detroit Lions team bad. They could be the only team to actually improve their record by having a COVID outbreak and having to sit out a few games (making them say, 0-12 rather than 0-16).

And the Vikings? What the heck happened up there? The Texans have quit on their coach, but I had thought Minnesota was a fairly solid outfit and had good coaching. Whew, was I wrong!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL is fickle.  Sometimes bad teams have a week that they look like a playoff team, and playoff teams look like bad teams.

But that disclaimer aside, the Jets look monumentally bad.  If they can avoid getting a win this week, they look like a good bet to be the last team to post a win.

Atlanta will sooner or later go into the fourth quarter behind by a couple of points and come back to win.  As long as they are entering the fourth with big leads, they can continue to demonstrate how to implode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We grabbed the best receiver the Jets have had since Keyshaun & Wayne Chrebet

They trade away their best defensive player because they can't assemble a competent coaching staff

Have the worst coach in the league.

But looking at the NYG offense, it's pretty putrid.  Without Barkley, I legit don't know anyone minus Sterling Shepard but he's been invisible for two years straight.  I can see them notching a win.  They've got Washington twice.

With NYJ, MIA has improved this season, hungry young talent and I don't see a win on their schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...