Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tony Pauline: Joe Brady will get interviewed for HC jobs this offseason


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Based on what exactly?  I mean I understand taking a chance on a young up and comer but seriously? What has he done halfway through his rookie season calling plays that leads one to think some GM out there is saying we have to get this guy at all costs?

If he goes he goes.  This is Rhules show so let's see how it plays out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet, I hope the next team that has him as their head coach likes questionable situational play calling and poor red zone efficiency. 

Brady is just too inexperienced to be a head coach. Anyone interviewing him is just measuring him up against who they actually hire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are 24th in scoring points per game. Why is he a hot candidate right now? We were 20th last year even though Will Grier started 2 games and couldn’t score at all, Cam started two games and was clearly hurt and Allen started 12 games.

How are we scoring less points per game than a hurt Cam and Kyle Allen last year? We were supposed to be an offensive juggernaut and we’re only scoring more than the Grier starts.

Sorry, but while I think Brady can get better, he shouldn’t be a HC candidate based on this year’s results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

We are 24th in scoring points per game. Why is he a hot candidate right now? We were 20th last year even though Will Grier started 2 games and couldn’t score at all, Cam started two games and was clearly hurt and Allen started 12 games.

How are we scoring less points per game than a hurt Cam and Kyle Allen last year? We were supposed to be an offensive juggernaut and we’re only scoring more than the Grier starts.

Sorry, but while I think Brady can get better, he shouldn’t be a HC candidate based on this year’s results.

I wonder if not having CMC factors into our bad red zone efficiency as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Needs more experience. He is on and off. Sometimes his calls really make your scratch your head and other times he’s genius. He’s really young so no doubt in time he’ll become much better than he is. With one of the worst olines in franchise history it is hard to judge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple years ago, no doubt he'd have massive interest and would probably get hired. Everyone was so obsessed with finding the next Sean McVay. That seems to have tempered a bit with coaches like Zac Taylor not exactly setting the world on fire. Certainly nothing Brady has shown has demonstrated he would be a strong head coach hire. But people have made stupider decisions so I wouldn't put it past the realm of possibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Manna said:

I wonder if not having CMC factors into our bad red zone efficiency as well

Maybe although Mike Davis has filled in well. I mean you’d think that Teddy + Robby + Mike > No Teddy + No Robbie + CMC. My point is not that Brady sucks but that we certainly haven’t shown enough improvement (scoring less) over last year to make our first year OC look like a great HC prospect. If he gets hired as a head coach next year it’ll be a mess. He needs a lot more seasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, countryboi said:

I dont know how anyone can hire a guy as a head coach that only has one full season of coordinator experience, at least get some head coaching experience at the college ranks 

If we were too 5 in scoring sure, but we are 24th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...