Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers pick 8


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, bababoey said:

Otah, Gamble, Brown (2nd round trade up but it cost us a 1st round in the following draft). Those are the only 3 I can think of.  Gamble was like 2 spots and it only cost us a 4th round pick but the other 2 cost us a 1st round pick the following year and then some.

I'm specifically talking about Brown and Otah there.  Brutal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Six QBs In the top 8 picks?  That would make NFL history.  Never has been done before. Not 5 or even 4.  Unless this draft bucks all NFL draft precedence, at most 3 QBs wil be gone before pick #8.

I don't think it is likely....but there are 5 teams in front of us that all are in need of a QB.   Which simply isn't ideal if you are a team that needs a QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, NAS said:

Exactly - but folks were so excited to beat Washington, even if it means years of misery LMAO

wow I didn't know potentially rocking with Teddy or a not Top 3 QB means years of misery.

 

Gear up for those Super Bowls Jags

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, musicman said:

I do NOT was a QB at 8. If it's not Lawrence or Fields, pass. Not sure if I would want Wilson. I would love CB Surtain to fall to us. A true shutdown corner from day 1, along with Jackson who played better (smarter) would give this Defense what we need. Our D-line was getting better and a year under Gross-Matos's belt with Obada's continued growth, with Burns, Brown and Kerr gives a us a real decent Defense front. Sam Franklin and Burris were solid along with Chinn who was great, heck even Elder and Carter played good. I year under the system and this defense will be better. 

We can get 2 Offensive lineman in the 2nd-3rd-4th rounds. It's gonna take at least a FA - TE and MLB and then we have a real competitive chance. That's saying we sign Samuel and Moton. Give Teddy a year, and O-line and a healthy CMC, Robby, DJ & Curtis, along with OC Brady having a year under his belt and we could win 10 games and the division next year. I have my worries about Teddy but this was not a fair year to evaluate anything. 

I like Surtain but he got abused by Kyle Pitts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Personally I would not take a running qb like Lance.  He will not have a long career in the NFL.  Maybe in the later rounds but not the first and definitely not at 8 nor would I trade up for him.

If he isn't going to be our power back I'm not too concerned or impressed with the running, just a bonus. Lance has the arm, lots unknown because he lost this year except a goofy game and has huge upside if a complete prospect. It could be a huge positive if the coaches are not brain-dead and use our QB as the primary RB, like all the time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

If he isn't going to be our power back I'm not too concerned or impressed with the running, just a bonus. Lance has the arm, lots unknown because he lost this year except a goofy game and has huge upside if a complete prospect. It could be a huge positive if the coaches are not brain-dead and use our QB as the primary RB, like all the time...

I just do not see enough to draft him that high.  He is over valued because of the desperate need of some teams needing a QB.  Never ever draft for need because you over draft ever single time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I just do not see enough to draft him that high.  He is over valued because of the desperate need of some teams needing a QB.  Never ever draft for need because you over draft ever single time.

He looks good but raw on tape. High ceiling. With him it comes down to if the coaches think they can get him there. No idea if that's a yes or no, no way to know unless you are in the meetings and interviews. Deffinatly pass if a no. We actually have a coaching staff that could coach up a prospect. Thats such a change for us. I see a lot of potential with Lance, missing this year could drop a guy to us that could have substantially raised his value in a normal year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Personally I would not take a running qb like Lance.  He will not have a long career in the NFL.  Maybe in the later rounds but not the first and definitely not at 8 nor would I trade up for him.

Definition of insanity: 

Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Cam was done by 30 because he did not fully evolve into a pocket passer and wasn't properly protected as a qb by the league.

Does anyone think if Lamar doesn't evolve into a more adept passer that he is likely to play much beyond 30?

Why would you draft a qb in this mold in the first knowing that even if he's successful, his shelf life will be about half that of true franchise qb's that play well into their 30's and beyond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I just do not see enough to draft him that high.  He is over valued because of the desperate need of some teams needing a QB.  Never ever draft for need because you over draft ever single time.

Looking at that highlight video he’s running over guys who are washing cars at auto bell this week. Reminds me of RG3. They’ll break him if he runs like that in the nfl. Has potential to either be good 2-3 years down the road or be an incredible bust 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Definition of insanity: 

Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Cam was done by 30 because he did not fully evolve into a pocket passer and wasn't properly protected as a qb by the league.

Does anyone think if Lamar doesn't evolve into a more adept passer that he is likely to play much beyond 30?

Why would you draft a qb in this mold in the first knowing that even if he's successful, his shelf life will be about half that of true franchise qb's that play well into their 30's and beyond?

Lamar doesn't try and truck people like Cam or Big Ben did early in their careers. Lamar is more like RGIII or Vick. It will just depend on how much he limits the damage. Look at Russell Wilson(not a rushing QB, I know) he is able to avoid a ton of punishment on his rushing attempts by being smart. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Lamar doesn't try and truck people like Cam or Big Ben did early in their careers. Lamar is more like RGIII or Vick. It will just depend on how much he limits the damage. Look at Russell Wilson(not a rushing QB, I know) he is able to avoid a ton of punishment on his rushing attempts by being smart. 

 

This is true, but Lance on the other hand is seen trucking players on just about every run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...