Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun WATSON Officially Requests Trade from Texans


ncstatekwi
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

How many Superbowls has Deshaun won, or been to? Those players minus Christian have been to, or went to one.

How many Super Bowls had Peyton Manning been to 4 years into his career? 

How many Super Bowls did Dan Marino win? 

How many did Warren Moon even appear in? 

Deshuan Watson is special.  Always has been.  From the first game he stepped on the field vs Florida St as a freshman to now. 

Now, can we debate if cost is worth it? Sure.  But he is exactly what teams are looking for. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, J.B. said:

Two 1’s and Bridgewater.

Anything more is just too much.

I think history shows the team giving up the farm for a player loses and the team getting all the picks usually wins  (Saints with Ricky, Vikings with Herschel)

I'd go two 1's and CMC as my no higher mark. 

and as a franchise I would quit paying RBs.   A lesson we never have learned. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

May take three firsts, a current player and maybe a second to get Watson. To put this into perspective, would you trade away players that could become three pro-bowlers and a good role player for their one QB? 
 

So, that is a Luke, Ryan Khalil, Christian McCaffery and Shaq Thompson for Deshaun Watson. 
 

As much as I would like Watson here, I do not believe that I would make this deal.

Or its Kelvin Benjamin, Shaq Thompson and Vernon Butler for Deshaun Watson. 

Can cherry pick first rounders all you want. Bottom line is the draft is literally an unknown. Watson however, is not. 

 

Also Ryan Kalil* was a 2nd rounder, not that it matters much in the pretense of this argument. His brother was a top 5 pick though so if you want to include him we can. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're high on his list, I wonder what guy we have to ship to HOU could put the trade over for the Texans.

They have needs all over.  I would make Shaq available in this. 

2021 1st

2021 3rd

2022 1st

2024 1st (We keep 2023)

Shaq Thompson

Pot sweetener: Donte Jackson

--

We send Teddy off in another manner/form.

We get:

Deshaun Watson

2022 2nd (They're going to be awful, this could easily be the 33-39th pick, same as a late first)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fitbit said in this introductory pressure that there's not that much difference between picks 20 to 40. Seattle traded back so much, he's used to not having a 1st round pick. He could make it work.

Watson is 25. You've got a decade of high level QB play, maybe more, plus all the marketing to the Clemson fans you thought Trevor would bring the franchise. 

Absolutely worth the deal Barnwell outlined.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, trueblade said:

Fitbit said in this introductory pressure that there's not that much difference between picks 20 to 40. Seattle traded back so much, he's used to not having a 1st round pick. He could make it work.

Watson is 25. You've got a decade of high level QB play, maybe more, plus all the marketing to the Clemson fans you thought Trevor would bring the franchise. 

Absolutely worth the deal Barnwell outlined.

I think that's an incentive to seek a 2nd rounder from HOU in 2022 or 2023 if we're going in on this.  They're going to be baaaad and that pick might as well be #33-39. If it takes (3) 1st rounders, then they should throw in a 2022 2nd.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A sprained watson acl puts us back in the top 10.  

I once watched Watson on a torn ACL complete 74% of his passes with 4 TDs to destroy his rival SEC opponent. 

Some kind of mythical creature, he is half man, half god, half possible Centaur, but I’m not sure, but either way, I wish he was my dad…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...