Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor circulating between a potential Panthers/Niners QB swap... Teddy B for Jimmy G


FeelTheBurns53
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jimmy G is easily better than Teddy. The injury thing is a concern, but Jimmy isn’t someone I’d want to hitch our wagon to anyway. Only reason to do this is to get an extra pick while the 9ers offload a contract. I assume Teddy’s is more manageable than Jimmy’s so it’s not a trade for QBs insomuch as it’s a trade our cap space for their draft pick, which we use to move up and get a QB

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Jimmy is better than Teddy, but not by a wide margin and that's only when he can stay on the field. 

Contractually, both have two years remaining.  Teddy has got 2yr/$49MM with dead cap hits associated with cutting him this year or the next of $20MM and $5MM respectively.  Jimmy has got 2yr/$53.4MM, but the dead cap hits are only $2.8MM and $1.4MM. 

So Jimmy has a more attractive deal in that he can be cut with less pain than cutting Teddy if he doesn't perform well.  If we trade Teddy, we still incur the dead cap hit.  So if this happens, we'd take a $20MM hit this year, and then if Jimmy sucks a $1.4MM hit next year after cutting him.

If you don't view Jimmy as an upgrade, it'd be better to just hold onto Teddy and take the $5MM dead cap hit for him next offseason.  Basically the deal only works if Jimmy works.  It can't be a swapping of spare parts.

 

EDIT: Looks like the cap rules are different for trades vs. cuts.  Spotrac showing that trading Teddy would actually only be a 10MM dead cap hit for us, either all at once (Pre June 1) or spread over two years (Post June 1).  Not sure why that's the case.  I was under the impression trading vs. cutting was the same.  That would make the swap more worth the risk IMO. 

Edited by woahfraze
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our new GM was ready and poised to get us absolutely wrecked on a terrible deal on par with what the WFT was offering for Stafford, but we were saved by the Rams. In short our new GM doesn't make winning deals for us, he gives up the farm and we get screwed. So a swap involving Jimmy and Teddy would result in us giving SF extra things, and us getting nothing but Jimmy. 

Edited by pantherj
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2018 Contract details by year 27 $6,200,000 $1,400,000 $28,800,000 $600,000 $37,000,000  $41,800,000 $41,950,000($41,950,000)  
2019 Contract details by year 28 $17,200,000 $1,400,000 $800,000 $600,000 $20,000,000 $13,700,000 $18,600,000($60,550,000)  
2020 Contract details by year 29 $23,800,000 $1,400,000 $300,000 $600,000 $26,100,000  $28,600,000 $24,700,000($85,250,000)  
2021 Contract details by year 30 $24,100,000 $1,400,000 $300,000 $600,000 $26,400,000 $2,800,000 $25,000,000($110,250,000)  
2022 Contract details by year 31 $24,200,000 $1,400,000 $800,000 $600,000 $27,000,000 $1,400,000 $25,600,000($135,850,000)

 

NOOOOO WAY, 24,000,000 in base for 2021?? Pay cut is the only way, rather keep Teddy 2 yards. SF just needs to cut him, he has no value....unless herniay never leftd the GM role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Someone correct me- doesn't Dave have a six year contract??? I think Dan Morgan does as well..... that's the price you have to pay once you get a rep for firing HCs....  
    • Brother re-check that guarantee...my page shows 30mill.....thats means he's staying in my book for at least til the end of 2026.  Im going to be my normal honest self, besides watching like half of the SB, I didn't know the guy. My guess is Panthers have a "planned model of paying players" and they almost had to spend a chunk of space on a DLman after Dbrown injury season gave them a nightmare out-come of worst D in NFL scoring. Once Milton got above Dbrown payments, they went with the plan B. A player whom the "co-GM" put his name with. Brad said turk would not be a problem off-field and leader, which the Panthers need badly. I dug in with the google-fu, I found out  I also found him playing lots of NT, which was shocking given the small frame. He seems ready for a bigger role and had a great SB too. IDK, I feel Dan Morgan was dead set on not going into this season without more DL depth and its there. The real deal is this, nearly all FA take one year to "adjust". I think turk is trying too hard and causing injuries as a result for his contract. Dbrown called turk "strong as hell" and I know for a fact Dbrowns has insane core and strength numbers. They lift together with the 50 LB difference...... you always lift with a guy who's similar in strength cause you can leave on the 8 wheels, let the other guy lift while you rest and go after him.  I do wish he had a better beginning to his panther career, 3 games for him to do so and it would cover up the low points if he made a few plays.... Again it felt like they almost had to make move/spend $$$ and Morgan was going to have DL depth this season no matter what...My best guess. 
×
×
  • Create New...