Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Look inside former Panthers $3.2M house

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Peon Awesome Experienced

Peon Awesome

Posted
Posted

What's he up to these days? You gotta think he almost has to sell it unless he's managed to have a profitable career post-football. Property tax alone has to be +$30,000 per year, not to mention several thousand per year in upkeep like heating and cooling the 9000 square feet. And that's even assuming he's actually paid it off, rather than still stuck with another $15,000 per month in mortgage payments. If not, you're talking over $200,000 per year just to keep living there. I don't care how smart he could've been with his money; that's hard to do for too long when you're living off savings alone. Really nice house though. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gofightwin Community Regular

gofightwin

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, NCBlu said:

Built in 2019, for sale by 2021 why get it built then? Nice home, but man that's a lot of space for one family.

Dude was passing $200k in bad checks at a casino this summer and was arrested.  "Homies took advantage of me" was the defense.  If you have homies like that, I am sure they have scammed him out of a ton of money, even if this one wasn't his fault.  Gonna go out on a limb and guess his gambling and buddies have not been kind on the cash.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheBigKat Grand Master

TheBigKat

Posted
Posted

25 million career earnings

 half goes to taxes and agent fees

 12 million give or take net

25% of net worth just in that house with god knows what other indiscretion spending.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thevikingage.com/2014/03/22/captain-munnerlyn-spends-1-million-strip-club-single-night/amp/

 

Safe to say this guy went to the Antoine Walker School of Business

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...