Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trubisky rumors


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I don’t know about that. Trubisky flat out struggles to move the offense. He’s more athletic than Teddy, but Teddy can at least get you in scoring position, albeit he’s absolutely god awful in the red zone. I really think it’s a push given their strengths and weaknesses. I wouldn’t want either as my starting QB and honestly I might prefer Bridgewater. And that thought makes me want to vomit. 

Hey we could sign Trubisky and play both. Use Teddy to get them to redzone and then put Trubisky in to get them the score. Boom

JK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitch has a bad offensive line, bad running game and only one good WR in Robinson. Plus (as previously stated) his coach did about everything to ruin his confidence. I wouldn’t want him as our 1st, 2nd, or 3rd choice. However if we strike out on other options, I think he would be an upgrade.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

Damn good receivers? Bears were top 5 in dropped catchable balls.... outside of Robinson they had no one.

They had Anthony Miller, rookie Darnell Mooney who looks to be legit, and Allen Robinson. Not to mention Jimmy Graham. That's a serviceable corps for anyone. 

Trubisky has problems that may or may not be able to be fixed:

 

"Trubisky still struggles with basic aspects of pro quarterbacking. He doesn’t consistently see open receivers, trust clean pockets, or keep his eyes dowfield amid a pass rush."

-Danny Heifetz of The Ringer 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, top dawg said:

They had Anthony Miller, rookie Darnell Mooney who looks to be legit, and Allen Robinson. Not to mention Jimmy Graham. That's a serviceable corps for anyone. 

Trubisky has problems that may or may not be able to be fixed:

 

"Trubisky still struggles with basic aspects of pro quarterbacking. He doesn’t consistently see open receivers, trust clean pockets, or keep his eyes dowfield amid a pass rush."

-Danny Heifetz of The Ringer 

 

 

This same anthony Miller? 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/bearswire.usatoday.com/2021/01/15/has-anthony-miller-played-his-last-down-with-the-bears/amp/

 

anthony Miller has been downright awful. I watch bears game almost as much as panthers. Their WR corps will be overhauled this offseason. They played bad with both foles and Mitch. 
 

david Montgomery was their third best receiver. Trubisky wasn’t the problem, it’s the entire roster of the bears on offense that’s the problem.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...