Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trubisky rumors


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

This argument that Mitch had good WRs is pretty silly.  Very serviceable RB at best as well. If Mitch gets into a situation where is isn't trying too hard he can be good.  How big a step up he is from Teddy is debatable.  Still, he has good upside at 26 in the right offense.  

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, I wouldn't hate kicking the tires on Trubisky, Chicago is a place of sorrow and despair for QB's and he came into the NFL with John Fox and now has Matt Nagy, both of which certifiably suck.  Trubisky was always a project that needed extra coaching at the next level, and I dont think he ever got that coaching in the NFL, could be good with Rhule and co.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

This same anthony Miller? 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/bearswire.usatoday.com/2021/01/15/has-anthony-miller-played-his-last-down-with-the-bears/amp/

 

anthony Miller has been downright awful. I watch bears game almost as much as panthers. Their WR corps will be overhauled this offseason. They played bad with both foles and Mitch. 
 

david Montgomery was their third best receiver. Trubisky wasn’t the problem, it’s the entire roster of the bears on offense that’s the problem.

So, you're saying that Trubisky isn't a problem? I've seen him play a little, and I'm not sure that he's a legit starter, much less a franchise QB! I distinctly remember his accuracy being all over the place. I'll give him some benefit of doubt for a suboptimal receiving corps, but he's still been sketchy on his reads and with his accuracy. He may be too far gone now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, top dawg said:

So, you're saying that Trubisky isn't a problem? I've seen him play a little, and I'm not sure that he's a legit starter, much less a franchise QB! I distinctly remember his accuracy being all over the place. I'll give him some benefit of doubt for a suboptimal receiving corps, but he's still been sketchy on his reads and with his accuracy. He may be too far gone now. 

He went 6-3 with 17 total TDs and 67% completion rate (bears franchise record) this season. He missed some throws, yes.. but it isn’t a mechanics piece. He is also in one of shittiest offensive systems in the league. Hence why Nagy will NOT bc the OC and HC next year. Just the HC.

 

not saying Mitch is a world beater, but in the next system he plays... I bet he will turn some heads. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The only way I would be onboard with rolling the dice on a Trubisky rehab effort is if we feel certain we can unload Teddy's contract via trade so that he would "only" hit us for $10M this year.

That's the only way man. It would be insane to carry both. Why not just draft QB with a better contract if you're keeping Teddy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, he's a tier above them, but you also touched on the money side of it.  With T-Mac locked in as our #1 on a rookie contract for a few more years, I'd much rather use that money that would be needed for DJ on our defense and develop Coker into our #2.   Especially given his contract situation as an UDFA, as his contract is up at the end of this year but we can keep him around for a 3rd team controlled year on the real cheap.  Which means we probably could get him to sign a very reasonable extension this offseason to give him a little more money while giving us a bargain contract for what he provides. DJ's contract is north of $20 million for the next 5 years, why pay that for your #2 WR with the needs we have on defense and you have guys like Coker, XL, and Horn on rookie contracts who very well could combine to be a serviceable 2-4 WRs behind a stud in T-mac? I love DJ and he'd be a great fit on this team as our #2, but the money side of it just makes absolutely zero sense, that's all it comes down to for me on this one. And no, I don't see the Bears wanting XL back in that trade, because they drafted Burden, who is essentially a better version of what XL provides, a player you want to get the ball into their hands and let them go to work.
    • I didnt see that many bad calls in the panthers cowboys game, but the chiefs especially in the playoffs were getting every single call they could get then the refs when it didnt matter would throw a call towards the other teams.  That I believe was the taylor swift effect.   But its crazy just thinking about how easy it is to change a game.  You dont need but a single ref to make a few close calls go towards one team over the other and in the nfl that is the game.  
    • I don't think it's unrealistically blaming Bryce Young......to say has been a reason, sometimes a big one, in why our pass offense overall has been extremely week over the past 3 collective seasons.  I think that bothering anyone, is just being overly invested in some Bryce Young argument.  It's just a reality.  
×
×
  • Create New...