Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not worth it to draft a qb in the first round


Sheldonyoung
 Share

Recommended Posts

The last 20yrs a totaled of 59 QBs taken in the 1st rd only 5 won a super bowl. Largely part of Brady denied them witch he was a 6 rd pick. I rather roll the dice and take a chance on a proven QB than draft one in the 1st who maybe a bust. All 1st Rd picks aren’t guaranteed there’s more LATE PICK HOFS THAN 1st rds ,Gotta roll the dice like the bucs did sometimes. We give up 3 1s we still have rd 2,3,4,5,6,7. IJS 
LET ME TEACH YOU HOW ITS DONE

  • Poo 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sheldonyoung said:

The last 20yrs a totaled of 59 QBs taken in the 1st rd only 5 won a super bowl. Largely part of Brady denied them witch he was a 6 rd pick. I rather roll the dice and take a chance on a proven QB than draft one in the 1st who maybe a bust. All 1st Rd picks aren’t guaranteed there’s more LATE PICK HOFS THAN 1st rds ,Gotta roll the dice like the bucs did sometimes. We give up 3 1s we still have rd 2,3,4,5,6,7. IJS 
LET ME TEACH YOU HOW ITS DONE

The bucs did not roll the dice, they added a competent QB to an already stacked roster. Then that QB got all his cronies to sign as well.

No option is a 100% guaranteed to get you a super bowl. We could trade for any QB in the league it does not matter.

Also there are more late round HOF qb's because that include at least 6 rounds compared to 1 round.

Whatever we do it will be a risk, but we have to take it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the greatest QB of all time won 1/3 of the SBs in that time period so we should not draft a QB in the first round lol

3 of those 5 first rounders also won multiple SBs and the majority of losing QBs were 1st round picks with another larger group being high 2nd rounders.

Yea man don't do it you might get to a SB.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady bogs it down so look at the conference title games:

2021: 3 first rounders & Brady

2020: 3 first rounders, 1 second rounder

2019: 2 first rounders, 1 second rounder, & Brady

2018: 2 first rounders, 1 4th rounder, & Brady

2017: 3 first rounders & Brady

2016: 3 first rounders & Brady

2015: 2 first rounders, 1 third, & Brady

I mean, come on

 

 

 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, saX man said:

Brady bogs it down so look at the conference title games:

2021: 3 first rounders & Brady

2020: 3 first rounders, 1 second rounder

2019: 2 first rounders, 1 second rounder, & Brady

2018: 2 first rounders, 1 4th rounder, & Brady

2017: 3 first rounders & Brady

2016: 3 first rounders & Brady

2015: 2 first rounders, 1 third, & Brady

I mean, come on

 

 

 

The answer is obvious. Clone Brady.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are being to hard on the idea.  I think he is right.  In fact, if they don't want to trade Watson, we should trade our next three first rounders for a package of three third rounders and sixth rounders and maybe some random fifth and seventh rounders.

That would have been dangerous when Hurney was around, given his track record after the first round, but we should be okay now.  Think of the trouble we avoid.

But then there is the opposite argument:

Season 4 Episode 10 GIF by Friends

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sheldonyoung said:

The last 20yrs a totaled of 59 QBs taken in the 1st rd only 5 won a super bowl. Largely part of Brady denied them witch he was a 6 rd pick. I rather roll the dice and take a chance on a proven QB than draft one in the 1st who maybe a bust. All 1st Rd picks aren’t guaranteed there’s more LATE PICK HOFS THAN 1st rds ,Gotta roll the dice like the bucs did sometimes. We give up 3 1s we still have rd 2,3,4,5,6,7. IJS 
LET ME TEACH YOU HOW ITS DONE

You don't understand math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...