Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitch Trubisky

Shocker

By Shocker,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
Just now, Tbe said:

Huh....wasn’t paying attention I guess.

Why did the Bears kick him loose? 

Because he wasn’t Mahomes or Watson and Nagy is a terrible offensive coordinator. He’s not perfect, but for the cheap contract he’ll likely sign, he’s about as good an option as we’ll have without selling the farm. 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Lol. That is the biggest bunch of crap I ever read. There defense lead them to the playoffs. His stats were pedestrian. 

If not for when they benched him for Foles (who looked way worse than Trubisky under Nagy), his stats work out to around 3600 yards and 28 TDs. That would be middle of the pack in yardage and #11 in TDs last year.

I think we have the better weapons and the far better offensive system. Nagy looks like a hack IMHO.

They had the #11 D in yardage and #14 D in scoring. Their D was decent. Above average. But definitely not a dominant D.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If not for when they benched him for Foles (who looked way worse than Trubisky under Nagy), his stats work out to around 3600 yards and 28 TDs. That would be middle of the pack in yardage and #11 in TDs last year.

I think we have the better weapons and the far better offensive system. Nagy looks like a hack IMHO.

They had the #11 D in yardage and #14 D in scoring. Their D was decent. Above average. But definitely not a dominant D.

I think for me I would rather take a raw rookie than a guy who has consistently struggled at this level. 
Sure he will have periods where he looks decent, even Bridgewater had those occasionally. But I just don’t want a retread. Either we get Watson, a rookie or have to endure another torturous season under Captain 2-Yards-On-4th-and-9. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

Why wasn’t the defense carrying them to the playoffs when Foles was the QB? 

Because they were playing against real playoff teams. The defense was holding teams under 20 points during the Bears winning streak and Mitch was beating bad teams. 
When he faced an actual good team in week 17, Green Bay, he crumbled and they were blown out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      College Basketball 2025

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Truth. Like when UNC hired Butch Davis and then we get hit for recruiting violations. Like yeah, no poo. Dude coached Miami when they we paying like the 33rd NFL team. What did you expect?
    • Basbear
      Processing Blue: immediate draft needs

      By Basbear · Posted

      He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 2 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ?? There's waiver claims too, they have done that each year.     
    • uncfan888
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By uncfan888 · Posted

      Big game tonight. Please send the annoying ass bandwagon New York fans home sad
×
×
  • Create New...