Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers cut DT Zach Kerr


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

Didn't think they're make this move but makes sense if they look for 3 techniques. Must like what they got out of Roy.

And even if they don’t like what they got out of him, he went to the right school. Sorry, I just have to vent. This team is so bad at being smart. And it’s not just today, it’s a multitude of things which add up every year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

And even if they don’t like what they got out of him, he went to the right school. Sorry, I just have to vent. This team is so bad at being smart. And it’s not just today, it’s a multitude of things which add up every year. 

I'll wait to see how it all plays out here the rest of the offseason. You just drafted 2 guys at his position so it was always a possibility even though they got good production out of him last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tin foil hat time, we use day 1 of FA to beef O-line, while cutting good D-line piece...Maybe to help make us more preferable to Watson?  Lord knows he doesnt wanna go somewhere and get killed like he has every season in Houston.  Just a thought because cutting Kerr makes no sense at all.  On the positive side for him, he'll prlly make a few more bucks than what he had on our contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kerr was a good depth guy.  I'm very curious what the plan is for DT.  Losing Kerr and Obada hurts that interior depth/pass rush.  Could we go DT in the first again???  Hope not!

I guess Frit wants to build his own team.  After a team history mostly under Hurney, this is going to be very different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...