Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Explain this to me..Saints and the cap


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

It isnt voodoo. It isn't rocket science. 

They have done what they've done for a decade and just restructured contracts to convert base pay to league minimum and spread the signing bonus out over the length of the deal. 

Void years arent anything new. They've been around forever, hell we used them on Matt Kalil and recently on Paradis.

Thats it, there's literally nothing else to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Every year this question is asked and every year Loomis works his voodoo and makes it happen. If they have a major setback this year and finish under 500, look for them to use 2022 to dump a ton of their cap problems. 

You just said it.... its every year because they just keep pushing more and more money to future years cap space think of it as buying on credit.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They restructured Hill, which will push about $8mil into future dead money. 
 

They cut about $40mil in salary, including starters (LB Kwon Alexander, WR Sanders,  CB Jenkins, TE Cook, LG Eaton, P Morstead. 
 

They also “officially” still have Brees on the roster. Once he leaves they get hit with an additional $10.4mil hit, so even though they are “only” $11 mil in the hole, they need $5mil+ for cushion throughout the year and another $8mil for rookies. 
 

So they are still about $35mil in the red for ‘21, plus they’ve restructured contracts to push money to future years. And they have no franchise QB.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the Saints do it is the way we did it with CMC and Shaq and every other team does it in the NFL.  The take a players current large salary, change it to a signing bonus and then they can spread it out over a 5 year period.  It lessens the cap hit for the current year but increases it for subsequent years.  It a player only has 1 or 2 years left on his current contract it mean they usually add voidable years at the end of the contract.  This ensures that their will always be dead money that hits the cap in the future because when the years void, which they will,  the remaining signing bonus hits the cap as dead money unless they sign a new contract.  

Every team does this, it's just the Saints do it every year and with multiple players a year.  It means they will never walk into a offseason with a lot of cap space and they will always have dead money on there books but they will always have room to add a least some players every year.  This only really hurts if you have multiple bad drafts in a row and don't have cheap rookies you can rely on to at least give you some playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, bababoey said:

The way the Saints do it is the way we did it with CMC and Shaq and every other team does it in the NFL.  The take a players current large salary, change it to a signing bonus and then they can spread it out over a 5 year period.  It lessens the cap hit for the current year but increases it for subsequent years.  It a player only has 1 or 2 years left on his current contract it mean they usually add voidable years at the end of the contract.  This ensures that their will always be dead money that hits the cap in the future because when the years void, which they will,  the remaining signing bonus hits the cap as dead money unless they sign a new contract.  

Every team does this, it's just the Saints do it every year and with multiple players a year.  It means they will never walk into a offseason with a lot of cap space and they will always have dead money on there books but they will always have room to add a least some players every year.  This only really hurts if you have multiple bad drafts in a row and don't have cheap rookies you can rely on to at least give you some playing time.

so trading 3 #1's & multiple other picks plus young players on rookie deals for a single player is probably not a good idea?

Edited by Scott12345
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...