Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Everything the Texans have been doing over the past year or two has been insanity. This would be par for the course.

While I grant that McNair is an idiot, the Texans being behind this really just isn't very credible.

I've also seen a couple of people suggest that Tepper did it to drive his trade price down. That's just lunacy.

Setting aside the conspiracy theories though, this is an extremely sad and difficult story.

Is the lawyer at the center of this a douchebag? Probably. It's more about the women than him though. If they're credible, this is pretty bad for Watson. And if more come forward, it only gets worse.

Like I said before, this isn't really about football anymore. It's about the real lives of Watson and the women involved.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:


Why would they ever cut him?

If they see him as a sexual predator who is assaulting women he should be cut. I would imagine this kind of thing can make part of his contract voidable. From a PR stand point cutting him (if found guilty) is the right thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the allegations all seem B.S., especially, all brought by the same Plaintiff's attorney. What are the odds they all contacted his attorney. Now it is a mission for this attorney to make a killing off this. The attorney is likely recovering 40% of any settlement. The more women the more he has to gain. 

I see it too much in my line of work. Rape allegations coming out a year later??

Flying someone from Atlanta to Houston to give him a message? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Forced oral sex doesn't qualify as assault?

I don’t think it’s right of anyone to say one person is right or wrong. Have u ever of heard of people lying? I think anybody saying someone is at fault at this point is dumb as hell. We have no idea what happened and that’s it. The truth will come out, trying to say anything right now is truth is ridiculous. I can’t believe a lot of people on hear just throw someone under the bus that doesn’t know anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BurnNChinn said:

I don’t think it’s right of anyone to say one person is right or wrong. Have u ever of heard of people lying? I think anybody saying someone is at fault at this point is dumb as hell. We have no idea what happened and that’s it. The truth will come out, trying to say anything right now is truth is ridiculous. I can’t believe a lot of people on hear just throw someone under the bus that doesn’t know anything. 

Court judges do just that, and they kinda have to.

Whether it's true or not isn't the point though. This was in response to someone saying that none of the allegations qualify as assault.

Forced oral sex would definitely be considered assault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Zod said:

If he was guilty he would have taken the 100 grand settlement. That's chump change. 

 

I'm not buying it until they present the receipts. 

Chump change would have been hiring an actual escort.

I’m not saying this is true but nobody knows and will likely ever know. But there’s too many accusations just to brush it off 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I have a hard time believing that if Watson said he wanted to retire a Texan, this would've still happened.

Very possible, but it also doesn’t mean the allegations aren’t true.

Maybe Cal/Texans heard about some of this stuff going on and decided to do their own investigation. 

Once they found some dirt, they handed it over to Buzzbee when the time was right. 

Anything is possible right now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Court judges do just that, and they kinda have to.

Whether it's true or not isn't the point though. This was in response to someone saying that none of the allegations qualify as assault.

Forced oral sex would definitely be considered assault.

None of us know this it is she said/ he said at this point.  We know nothing and people trying to say on person is right or wrong at this point need to let it play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

None of us know this it is she said/ he said at this point.  We know nothing and people trying to say on person is right or wrong at this point need to let it play out.

Again, not about that.

The discussion was about a single question: Does forced oral sex qualify as sexual assault? The answer to that is yes.

Whether or not Watson is guilty of it is a whole separate discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Again, not about that.

The discussion was about a single question: Does forced oral sex qualify as sexual assault? The answer to that is yes.

Whether or not Watson is guilty of it is a whole separate discussion.

Yeah but that’s what people want to just throw out there is he is guilty that is wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...