Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your "so far" take on Fitterer

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted

hes making good reasonable logical signings...that you would expect a competent GM to make...Hurney would have signed 3 mufkers to 4 yr 60m contracts that sit on the bench by now... Supposedly his forte is digging out talent past round one...so..lets see how that turns out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
run-run-pass-punt Rising Star

run-run-pass-punt

Posted
Posted

I think he's got an approach I like so far, looking for dirty, undervalued (potential) diamonds that can be rinsed off and shine. (In many cases)

Looking to spend cap resources efficiently for the most part. Good cost-benefit approach overall.

But of course, as with all things...we'll see how it plays out. I'm optimistic given the small sample.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

Herniay can not hurt us has been his best thing thus far. His first signing was a raw project that Seahawk spent a 7th on, wavied, and didnt care to resign him on the PS. He was trying to be a DE and panthers are going for a TE. I like hes involved in many players/trades/ etc. I hated other teams knowing when the panthers had no interest in bring a guy in cause he didnt fit, it was dumb. 

 

His free agent class is one big whelmer, I do not like either OL, but understand somebody has to play. Reddick was more a Rhule signing, but watching his highlights, many came against TEs, RBs, no bodies, and one giant game. (Very poor imo) Waved Kerr, a cheap hard playing vet at a already thin spot. Didnt even tender Efa, cause _______ ?? Hasnt signed ANderson, Moton, or Moore to long term deals. Its a very odd year, but he pushed more money for future cap issues on CMC and Shaq, NFL players where taking cuts.

Thus far 3/10, can jump up depending on draft and how well the FAs play. Its unfair to grade him, just playing along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saca312
      In addition to Evero there's one large change that likely should happen.

      By Saca312 · Posted

      It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Puresteel55
      Carolina Panthers pick No. 19-2026 NFL Draft

      By Puresteel55 · Posted

      Bryce Boetcher
    • TylerDurden
      CBS Sports brief discussion about questionable Canales decision making

      By TylerDurden · Posted

      Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...