Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So Kellen Mond anyone?


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Anyone?

I can see us taking LT at 8 and then moving back into the late first to take him. 

Better or worse than Jones? Do we want this? Am I trying to convince myself things will work out?

This Is Fine GIF

hold me.

I said this very thing several weeks ago

that  Rhule connection you know 

trade down then pickup this kid in the third or fourth 

do I like it, no but we are on the Rhule train

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

He’s not worth it in my eyes before round 3. He’s the most inconsistent QB in the SEC the last four years. 

Agreed. He has intriguing physical tools and seems like a smart guy and a good guy but his play is wildly erratic. There's a reason why TAMU basically played Fox ball.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Anyone?

I can see us taking LT at 8 and then moving back into the late first to take him. 

Better or worse than Jones? Do we want this? Am I trying to convince myself things will work out?

This Is Fine GIF

hold me.

I’d rather have Trask.  Not that I want him.

But if we are now resorting to this tier.  Give me the FL kid over Mond.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ok with Trask outside of the 1st and cringe on a statue in the 2nd. Now that there will be stupid amounts of QBs all up front, it's going to pull the lackluster lot up with them 😕

The secondary to all this: few teams have some really hard pills to swallow with dealing current starting QBs that are going to find new homes if they want a chance to start. Might be a buyers market on a few if them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...