Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So Kellen Mond anyone?


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Anyone?

I can see us taking LT at 8 and then moving back into the late first to take him. 

Better or worse than Jones? Do we want this? Am I trying to convince myself things will work out?

This Is Fine GIF

hold me.

I said this very thing several weeks ago

that  Rhule connection you know 

trade down then pickup this kid in the third or fourth 

do I like it, no but we are on the Rhule train

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

He’s not worth it in my eyes before round 3. He’s the most inconsistent QB in the SEC the last four years. 

Agreed. He has intriguing physical tools and seems like a smart guy and a good guy but his play is wildly erratic. There's a reason why TAMU basically played Fox ball.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Anyone?

I can see us taking LT at 8 and then moving back into the late first to take him. 

Better or worse than Jones? Do we want this? Am I trying to convince myself things will work out?

This Is Fine GIF

hold me.

I’d rather have Trask.  Not that I want him.

But if we are now resorting to this tier.  Give me the FL kid over Mond.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ok with Trask outside of the 1st and cringe on a statue in the 2nd. Now that there will be stupid amounts of QBs all up front, it's going to pull the lackluster lot up with them 😕

The secondary to all this: few teams have some really hard pills to swallow with dealing current starting QBs that are going to find new homes if they want a chance to start. Might be a buyers market on a few if them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...