Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are we doing in the draft?

Verge

By Verge,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Seems all the reports that came out recently are right- Panthers dont like Fields/lance. Panthers hot for Darnold. 

They suck at keeping things in house, might as well put a mic'd up cameras, will not change much...

Do you have the links about the Panthers not liking Lance and Fields?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Verge Veteran

Verge

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Basbear said:

So they may draft Lance/Fields still......and keep teddy? Not much surpises me in this new world, but all that would. 

So the one thing my guy has always been consistent on with us is that Teddy is not going to be a member of this team at the start of next season. Teddy will not be a Panther. If Fields fell to 8 I wouldn't rule it out, but it seems unlikely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Do you have the links about the Panthers not liking Lance and Fields?

Not that I’ve heard. I don’t get the sense the Panthers love the quarterbacks besides Lawrence and Wilson.

— Joe Person (@josephperson) March 29, 2021

 

You owe me, had to dig in persons' twatter feed....yuck

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Tannehill was much better after 3 seasons not 2. After year 2, you can say that they were very close. It’s year 3 when Darnold dropped and honestly, I don’t know how to compare Darnold to anyone because his supporting cast on offense was truly awful. Tannehill in year 3 had Lamar Miller, Jarvis Landry, Mike Wallace, Hartline and Clay. I could argue that the skilled positions for Tannehill were better at every spot.

Again, I get that Tannehill improved but he and Darnold were almost identical after two years and Miami was actually adding guys like a rookie Landry in year 3 while the Jets were cleaning house for draft picks.

I do think it’s fair to compare the two in the first two years and I think it’s also fair to say that it’s not fair to compare year 3.

Will Darnold jump with us? I have no clue but I’d give him a chance. Do I think we overpaid? Yes. Am I glad we didn’t part with anything meaningful this year and future 1sts?

Fun fact though and another difference.  

Sam Darnold today, is still a year younger than rookie Tannehill was.  
 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Double Trouble Collaborator

Double Trouble

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Fun fact though and another difference.  

Sam Darnold today, is still a year younger than rookie Tannehill was.  
 

 

Yep. Also almost a year younger than Burrow. 

Played LB for first two years at San Clemente (filled in for two starts at QB).

Junior year, played 4 games due to injury. Dude had 106 pass attempts going into his senior year of high school.  Started two years at USC.

So basically he only had 3 years LIFETIME experience as a QB before being drafted by the Jets and was forced to start with no weapons and poor coaching. Recipe for disaster for anyone let alone a guy that new to the position.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Khyber53
      WWE pay per view and programming thread

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • CPantherKing
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...