Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers give Teddy permission to seek a trade


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Darnold already earned it.

Bridgewater's not competing for anything here.

Has he?

How so?

@kungfoodude asked an interesting question in another thread...were you a No on Jameis Winston but are All In on Sam Darnold?

If so, why?

  • Beer 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fitterer said he talked to Bridgewater and his representatives but was careful not to rule out the possibility of last year's starter staying here in some role. This is where you have to point out that everything is always on the table — "In on every deal" means "In on every deal" — but Fitterer alluded to the possibility of a contract adjustment or a trade, as well.

"I think there's things we have to work through, obviously," Fitterer said. "And I've already talked to Teddy's agents. We're going to find the right place, whether it's here or wherever it may be, we'll figure things out, contract-wise as well."

  • Beer 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Waldo said:

That's what I understood. If we trade him, chuckle, we pay 10 million of his salary this year. Looking like a cut incoming but who knows at this point. Pressure and desperation makes for odd decisions in the NFL.

If we trade him we don’t pay his salary. We’d save $10M extra which is his guaranteed salary that we pay if we release him. There is $10M in signing bonus dead cap that hits our cap no matter what (half can be spread into 2022 with post 6/1 cut). If we trade him then the pre/post June 1st doesn’t really matter. We’d save a minimum of $13M cap this year and $21M in cap this year or $18M this year and $16M next year. We aren’t hurting for cap this year so it’s a wash with rollover. The key is getting a trade done. That’s what really helps.

  • Beer 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Teddy is not a starting quarterback but the way our trio of head coach gm and owner have handled the public relations aspect with our last two quarterbacks leaves a lot to be desired in my eyes. You can certainly see they are learning on the fly with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

Why would another team give Teddy a chance to start when the Panthers, who were a bad team last season, are saying he wasn't good enough for them?

Because some teams don't mind a game manager. I actually think Rivera would be happy with a QB like Teddy but not sure if he'll want to do us any favors and he seems enamored with Heinicke. I think he'd also fit well with what the Patriots have traditionally done but seems like they may be trying to evolve their offense. Also, he may be better than anything the Broncos have not really sure if he fits their scheme though.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, stbugs said:

If we trade him we don’t pay his salary. We’d save $10M extra which is his guaranteed salary that we pay if we release him. There is $10M in signing bonus dead cap that hits our cap no matter what (half can be spread into 2022 with post 6/1 cut). If we trade him then the pre/post June 1st doesn’t really matter. We’d save a minimum of $13M cap this year and $21M in cap this year or $18M this year and $16M next year. We aren’t hurting for cap this year so it’s a wash with rollover. The key is getting a trade done. That’s what really helps.

56 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

FWIW:

image.png.c09b0397c37f73569d24ade7207c852f.png

if we trade him effort 6/1 it looks like we have a dead cap hit of 10 million. 

Honestly, whatever. Get some cap back either way and off to the next cheaper mistake. I will be shocked if someone wants him at 12 million this year. Looking like a cut is the likely hand here. Go Texans!

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Waldo said:

if we trade him effort 6/1 it looks like we have a dead cap hit of 10 million. 

Honestly, whatever. Get some cap back either way and off to the next cheaper mistake. I will be shocked if someone wants him at 12 million this year. Looking like a cut is the likely hand here. Go Texans!

There’s $10M from his signing bonus, that’s locked in. Basically, paid him $15M in signing bonus (what an effin waste) and it was going to hit $5M cap each year. What we “save” is his $18M in 2021 salary, $10M of which is guaranteed and $21M in 2022. If we can’t trade him then we get stuck with $10M in salary for 2021 and the $10M in dead cap from the signing bonus. If we trade him all we have is that dead cap and nothing more. We’d save $39M in cap over 2021 and 2022 if we can trade him even with the signing bonus dead cap. We still save $29M if we have to release him. It would just be nice to have less of a mistake.

At this point, it’ll be hard to trade him because we’ve already laid out our plan. We should have been in trade Teddy mode from the start. Unfortunately, somehow Teddy was still a backup plan. We should have just pulled the bandaid off. Worst case if we didn’t get a QB is Grier/Walker/later round rookie and top pick in 2022.

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, stbugs said:

There’s $10M from his signing bonus, that’s locked in. Basically, paid him $15M in signing bonus (what an effin waste) and it was going to hit $5M cap each year. What we “save” is his $18M in 2021 salary, $10M of which is guaranteed and $21M in 2022. If we can’t trade him then we get stuck with $10M in salary for 2021 and the $10M in dead cap from the signing bonus. If we trade him all we have is that dead cap and nothing more. We’d save $39M in cap over 2021 and 2022 if we can trade him even with the signing bonus dead cap. We still save $29M if we have to release him. It would just be nice to have less of a mistake.

At this point, it’ll be hard to trade him because we’ve already laid out our plan. We should have been in trade Teddy mode from the start. Unfortunately, somehow Teddy was still a backup plan. We should have just pulled the bandaid off. Worst case if we didn’t get a QB is Grier/Walker/later round rookie and top pick in 2022.

I'm not debating his salary or cost. I honestly don't really care, we burnt all that money when we gave him this deal.

I do agree with all rest. I fear a Seatle-esk draft incoming and that is going to be a bigger issue. There are some real reasons to question this crews ability to judge talent on the O, like Teddy being a backup plan when it was evident that bridge was burnt. Combine that with the beginner level skills of our GM this offseason and Teddy's cost just goes up in smoke for me. I fear at this point the Teddy debacle was just a new normal for us. 

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • BELIEVE!!!

    jimmy-clausen.jpg

     

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree. Darnold has a lot more upside potential than Teddy but just as importantly IMO is that he has far more massive bust potential too. You know what you're getting with Teddy. Straight up mediocrity. Darnold is far more boom or bust which is a good thing in my mind. Better chance to be the answer and also a better chance to land us a premium draft pick of he's not. Win/win in my book.
    • Always a joke in My book.  He thought Bortles was better than Cam.  Was all aboard the Pickles hype train.  
    • Of course there will be disagreement, and when some Huddlers disagree with me, it strengthens my confidence in the stability of my points.  Others make me question my thinking and consider alternative ideas.  I prefer these posters, but this thread welcomes all, so I color coded it.  At any rate, I digress.  This chart may be missing a name or two--I omitted people I did not think had a chance to make the roster, and of course, there will be draft picks etc. to knock some out, but this is where we are in my mind. Red:  These are areas of concern for me, even if we addressed them in free agency. Orange:  These areas scare me, and I would not be surprised to see a player added here. Blue:  I think we are OK to maybe better than OK in this area, depending on who shows up. Green:  Forget about needing help THIS year in this area.  However, later in the draft, developmental prospects might be needed. (Players named in parentheses are depth but this may not be their primary position, so they appear beneath another position) Specific Comments: OLB vs. 3-4 rush OLB vs. DE---gets confusing so I tried to break them down as best I could.  QB:  I am of the mindset that you have to give Darnold a chance with coaching, blocking, and weaponry.  So he is average for now. LT and LG:  We signed 2 players early, and I am not sure that they are more than insurance, but we signed them for 2, 3 year deals and for $$$.  Confusing, but I think they are still below average. TE: Might be average.  If Arnold has a good year, Thomas is decent depth, and I think Sullivan is going to make the roster and contribute.  DT (3 Tech):  We have nobody to put there. CB: I am scared.  Very scared. S:  How is this not more of a focal point? Slot WR:  I understand the Waddle love now.  How awesome would we be? Once again, sticking my neck out by sharing.  It just helped me see the big picture, so I thought you might like to see it as well.  Enjoy.  
×
×
  • Create New...