Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Darnold plays poorly next year, we traded what will be a 1st round pick for him.


bobowilson
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

How does 2nd rounder 1 year out = 1st round pick?  I get the point that if we are the worst team, it will be the 33rd overall pick.  But, there is a time value associated with these picks you know.

Agreed, I really dislike the argument of “it’s basically a first round pick” and then calling a second a first, just because it’s high in the second round. I get draft value, a lot of the prospects around there are similar, but it’s still a second rounder.  That’s why they have different rounds and not just one massive chucklefug round of drafting.  

 

Also a pet peeve, when someone says SF gave up 3 firsts to move up to number 3 overall.  No, they gave up 2 firsts.  They still have a first round pick this year and did not lose 3 total firsts.  That bugs the hell out of me when people talk about trading.  Always used to make a trade sound worse than it is.  Nobody asked but I wanted to vent 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

I didn't want Darnold, but... let's just. let. this. thing. play. out.

Good or bad move, time will tell.

You realize that if he throws a bad pass in his very first series with us in the preseason, people will be declaring that he's a bust and they knew it and they don't need to see anymore, right?

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PandaMan said:

Agreed, I really dislike the argument of “it’s basically a first round pick” and then calling a second a first, just because it’s high in the second round. I get draft value, a lot of the prospects around there are similar, but it’s still a second rounder.  That’s why they have different rounds and not just one massive chucklefug round of drafting.  

 

Also a pet peeve, when someone says SF gave up 3 firsts to move up to number 3 overall.  No, they gave up 2 firsts.  They still have a first round pick this year and did not lose 3 total firsts.  That bugs the hell out of me when people talk about trading.  Always used to make a trade sound worse than it is.  Nobody asked but I wanted to vent 🤷🏻‍♂️

But they literally did give up three first round picks. Now granted they got a first round pick back, but how else would you possibly word it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

But they literally did give up three first round picks. Now granted they got a first round pick back, but how else would you possibly word it?

“They gave up two first round picks”

 

Edit:to me, “giving up” means total loss. I guess that’s where the difference is

Edited by PandaMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bobowilson said:

 

Teddy was mediocre, but a competent game manager with good skill players.  Darnold has bee a complete dumpster fire, and you don't win more than 4 games with him unless he improves tremendously.

 

I think if Darnold improves quite a bit he could get us to 6 wins...possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, I hear what y'all are saying, but Derrick could have been positive without being negative.  He essentially accused people of not seeing Bryce's improvement because of their desire to not be wrong. He could've kept it about Bryce and the team. For example, he could've said: "Bryce has made strides, and we believe in him. This coming season, his continued improvement will turn a lot of people into believers."  That would've been supportive of his teammate and sent a message to the doubters. That being said, his tact almost summoned and left the door ajar for more skepticism. That's my take anyway. Bryce has improved from the bottom to perhaps skirting the line between the bottom third and mid-third at best...after three seasons. We've all seen it. Yay! In my mind, Bryce has still got a long way to go and a short time to get there, but my expectations are top five--at least top 10--always! Yes, I am a fan, so there's that, but I don't believe it's unreasonable to expect excellence. Hopefully the Panthers FO has the same mindset (and that doesn't even necessarily have anything to do with what we gave up to acquire him). That is the lens I'm looking through. Derrick Brown has his homer glasses on. He just needs to be more diplomatic and thoughtful with his words in my opinion, but I get it that he's a good teammate.
    • I have no doubt the Canes will come out like gangbusters, huge bounce back from game one - my only concern is Freddie, if he lets in a couple of softies and Dobes stays hot we could be in trouble.
    • @DavidEng1   @Panthers Fan 691 @Kuhndog943 @Stumpy2 @organicrusty12013 @cookinbrak1
×
×
  • Create New...