Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record: WHO DO YOU WANT!


Brooklyn 3.0
 Share

Recommended Posts

It'd be easier for me to list who I don't want because there's more that'd make me happy than unhappy the

Parsons - Not a mike in today's NFL. Nore Anthony Barr than anything close to resembling Luke. Just as middling in coverage as Shaq is and takes himself out of the play way too often for me to feel safe taking him at 8. Has tremendous upside, i just think drafting him would be a square peg in a round hole type of deal. 

Caleb Farley - Easily CB3 behind Horn and Surtain. Reminds me of DJax where he's an athlete playing DB and his athleticism bails him out. Also good upside, i just think he is extremely raw. 

Anything on the D-line/pass rush - Weak d-line class and we're actually looking good in our front 7 right now. Even if there's a possible BPA there I would pass on it.

Mac Jones - Eh? At this point with Sammy here I think their ceiling is pretty similar at this point. Much rather develop Sam since we got him than have him and Mac battle it out.

 

Anything else would be fuging gravy.

Edited by Rags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thefuzz said:

OT. 

Either one of them.

Don't care for another position at all, but could be consoled if both T's are gone and we take the top CB.

No thank you to TE, 3/4/5 QB, LB, or WR.

I agree with you about taking either of the top two OTs. That said, I would be happy with Pitts if he is there and the two tackles are gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I agree with you about taking either of the top two OTs. That said, I would be happy with Pitts if he is there and the two tackles are gone.

Like I said in another thread, if we take a TE at 8, I'm going to need to take a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...