Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jamarr chase at 8?

RIPTreyLance

By RIPTreyLance,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

There’s been rumblings that they view slater in the same class as Sewell so I think if one of the two are there we will draft one. 
 

there’s been a ton of talk we are high on pitts and waddle as well. I hope we do the right thing and take the tackle regardless. We desperately need to address this oline.

My fear is Sewell and Slater being gone by 8.

Bengals take Sewell and Lions take Slater. 

Although the Bengals could take Slater since they just signed Reiff. Slater can play RT this season for them. And then the Dolphins take Sewell in this scenario. 

Let’s assume the Falcons are locked in on Pitts. 

I’d hope there would be opportunity to trade back if that’s the case. A team trying to jump in front of Denver for a QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Reebis21 said:

Best path for Pitts

Falcons - QB
Bengals - Sewell
Dolphins - Chase

Best chance to get Sewell

Falcons - QB
Bengals - Chase
Dolphins - Pitt

Whats our best path for Chase cuz I don’t honestly see it?

Falcons - Lance

Bengals - Sewell

Phins - Pitts (he may be rated higher - FWIW Kiper has them moving up for him)

Lions - Slater, Parsons

Link to comment
Share on other sites
methodtoll Proficient

methodtoll

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't be mad... If you listened to what Rhule said his presser, he mentioned that getting better on defense, adding support on both sides of the line, and adding more talent to the passing game was key for them in the draft so I could see it happening so as long as round 2 is about the offensive line. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RIPTreyLance Enthusiast

RIPTreyLance

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, jamos14 said:

If Pitts, Sewell, and Fields are all gone,  I'd be happy to get Chase. 

 

I'd take Chase over Slater but I would be happy with him too.   Slater is the "more safe" option but Chase has much more superstar potential.

 

 

Why are we so sold on slater when the majority of draft pundits are questioning whether he's even going to be playing Left tackle? If it's not a true Left tackle I don't want him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Why are we so sold on slater when the majority of draft pundits are questioning whether he's even going to be playing Left tackle? If it's not a true Left tackle I don't want him...

That's where I'm at too but it's mostly about arm length.  Those defending him point to the game against Chase Young where he shut him down so it proves he can handle a top tier pass rusher even with the shorter arms.

I just don't love a pick in top 10 that feels close to their ceiling already.   Slater is already very technical skilled and likely maxed his frame at only 6'3.  

I wouldn't be angry if they chose him but if Sewell/Pitts/Chase/Fields are all gone, I'm trading down.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I'd be mad as hell... If they go another glamour position instead of finally securing the most important spot on the Oline..

They have to know the history here.. This would completely crush my idea that we truly have a intelligent and up and coming FO...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bythenbrs Grand Master

bythenbrs

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I think that we take Sewell if he is there.

For a moment, it appeared as if you were departing from the revered Holy Church of the Left Tackle.  I now see that your momentary loss of faith was transient.  You are absolved of your sins.  Go in peace, my son.

Edited by bythenbrs
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mills Rising Star

Mills

Posted
Posted (edited)

Stick to your draft board and dont reach for need. If you have Chase rated above Slater, then fug it, trust your scouting and pull the trigger.

It would be hard to be mad at Chase in rd.1 and Eichenburg, Leatherwood etc. in rd.2. Adding talent to what was a talent deficient roster is the goal.

Edited by Mills
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...