Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Are the Chances of Sewell Actually Dropping to us?


Hoenheim
 Share

What are the Chances of Sewell Dropping to 8?  

93 members have voted

  1. 1. What are the chances of Sewell dropping to 8?

    • 100%
      0
    • 95%
      0
    • 90%
    • 80%
    • 75%
    • Between 50% and 75%
    • Between 25% and 50%
    • Between 10% and 25%
    • Practically no chance


Recommended Posts

Sewell has to be our #1 prospect at this point . If the Bengals take Chase or Pitts we could have a decent shot at getting him . What do you think our chances are? 

 

And I'm starting to see a trend among mocks that if Sewell doesn't go to Cinci then the Lions take him right before our pick . If they really are that big of a threat to take him why wouldn't the Panthers trade up slightly to get him ? I personally would gladly trade one or two mid rounders along with 8 to get Detroit's 7 or Miami's 6 to get Sewell. It shouldn't cost that much because Detroit or Miami could likely still get the player they wanted because they only traded down one or two spots .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

My prediction trying to see through all the smokescreens and bs.

 

1. Jax- Tevor Lawrence

2. NYJ- Zach Wilson

3. SF- Justin Fields 

4. ATL- Kyle Pitts

5. CIN- Ja'Marr Chase

6. DEN- (trade) Trey Lance

7. NE- (trade) Mac Jones

8. CAR- Penei Sewell

9. MIAMI- Jaylen Waddle

10. DAL- Jaycee Horn

5 qb's in 7 picks????  While I would love for that to happen its just not going to go down like that. 

 

I think SF goes with Mac and the draft really starts with ATL.  If they go QB (which I doubt) then the craziness will start.  I still think they go pitts and Lance and/or fields begin their descent down the draft board. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

5 qb's in 7 picks????  While I would love for that to happen its just not going to go down like that. 

 

I think SF goes with Mac and the draft really starts with ATL.  If they go QB (which I doubt) then the craziness will start.  I still think they go pitts and Lance and/or fields begin their descent down the draft board. 

Thing is who have you heard talked up vs. who has been dogged the last couple of months? I feel like SF wants Wilson. Some team in the top 8 has been pushing the narrative that Jones is maybe the most pro ready, cerebral QB outside of Lawrence. SF wants to make the Jets overthink and take Jones.

On the flip side idk if Jones is the #3 QB on SF board, they just think the Jets value that style of QB over a Lance or Fields. Not much has been said about Lance outside of his lack of experience in Division 1, I personally think the #3 is between him and Fields if Wilson doesn't fall. Fields on the other hand went from consensus #2 to (falling out of the top 10)? All because he's been put through the wringer. It stinks of teams trying to get him to fall, maybe Carolina or Detroit but likely Denver, New England, Washington or Chicago.

I personally think if either Jones or Fields are available at #8 Carolina will draft them, even though I would be annoyed, that's why Denver or NE will trade up. I could also see the Chargers jumping us at #7 if Sewell falls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...