Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are the 49ers okay?


Raleigh PF
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ultimately, I think the tea leaves are reading Trey Lance after Shanny's gushing about the read option offense and running QB threat yesterday combined with the rumors that the Niners are likely to hang onto Garappolo for the time being despite multiple potential suitors. Lance is the elite QB prospect who would benefit most from not being forced to play immediately.

I'm not sure which presser you saw, but the one from the 27th seems a little different in tone --

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If that's true it's hilarious. The look on Shanny's face at Bama's pro day watching Mac Jones miss throws was the look of a man who was basically realizing

tenor.gif

He's still in prime position to pick fields or lance though. Or are they just that bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in the end, the Mac Jones thing was a Kyle creation and bullpoo.  Then the media started running with the clickbait story thanks to Kyle’s good buddy Simms. 

If I a was in Vegas I’d throw a dollar on Mac being the 5th QB taken....like it always was suppose to be. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean before they got Jimmy G, Lynch asked about TB12.

Doesn't hurt to see if they couldn't sell the farm for Rodgers. Him and the Packers are going through some commitment issues. 

 

This had nothing to do with them not liking the QBs in this draft and Rodgers being the amoung the best QBs in the league.

Edited by Rags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rags said:

I mean before they got Jimmy G, Lynch asked about TB12.

Doesn't hurt to see if they couldn't sell the farm for Rodgers. Him and the Packers are going through some commitment issues. 

It sure does feel like the Packers org would prefer to move on from Rodgers.....it’s just the fact he is the probably the best pure QB in the league, the wins and fans getting in the way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

I can't see the Packers trading Rogers as long as he's not demanding it. 

I don’t think Rodgers and the Packers actually like each other though...it’s a weird dynamic.   Last years draft was a middle finger IMO to Rodgers. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
    • I'm excited. I love situations like this when you could potentially find a diamond in the rough on the cheap. And you know guys like this are gonna put in the work and desire way more than others to be great. 
×
×
  • Create New...