Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: A.Rodgers wants out of Green Bay


firefox1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

How far in the future can draft picks be traded? Not sure what GB thought would happen, especially after drafting Love last year.

If I’m GB, I’m getting back on the phone with SF. 3rd overall, 2024 first rounder, handful of middle round picks  and players. If I still like Love, I’m trading back and stock piling additional picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I dont think SF has the draft assests.  take the 3, 43rd and next years 2nd.  I might do that.  But then SF would be absolutely playing russian roulette

Not saying SF just in general. I would get a fugton of draft capital from some team. Aaron is 37 and a pain in the ass. Get a haul and rebuild your team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, holderoftruth said:

How far in the future can draft picks be traded? Not sure what GB thought would happen, especially after drafting Love last year.

If I’m GB, I’m getting back on the phone with SF. 3rd overall, 2024 first rounder, handful of middle round picks  and players. If I still like Love, I’m trading back and stock piling additional picks.

Three years down the road is the max.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRumGone said:

Not saying SF just in general. I would get a fugton of draft capital from some team. Aaron is 37 and a pain in the ass. Get a haul and rebuild your team.

I mean I would probably do it just to get him out of the building.

 

Also I just read that he just got married to a hollywood actress????  When the hell did that happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, philit99 said:

That's why I mentioned, Brady. Rodgers going up against Brady twice in one year and seeing who can win the division. It could be an enticing offer, of course the Saints would be attractive too.  

I think the Saints will be the most likely landing spot in the NFCS, if any team besides SF has a shot.  Rodgers would fit right in with SP as both are huge dickheads.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I think the Saints will be the most likely landing spot in the NFCS, if any team besides SF has a shot.  Rodgers would fit right in with SP as both are huge dickheads.

Probably why it is a bad fit at the same time.  Two huge dickheads normally don't make for a good partnership.    

But I think Rodgers is looking for a Tom scenario.  What team is built where I can just walk in and go get a quick ring and have a say in how to go about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...