Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Whatev said:

I don't think Moehrig will be there, but if he is the decision between best OT and Moehrig will be a tough one to make.  If you take Moehrig, do everything possible to trade back into the 2nd to get a quality OT.  

Only 6 teams pick prior to us so there is a good chance he’s there.

The run on EDGE guys and the 2 RB’s late 1st round last night was very much to our benefit. 

Rhule wanted more picks so maybe we trade back from #39

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaLivin Grand Master

CarolinaLivin

Posted
Posted

I think the true smokescreen was screaming BPA and still "reaching" for a need.

I put reach in quotations because I don't think it was that much of a reach. I like the kid, but I could've been happier with another selection. Still ready to see what the defense will look like now that Phil Snow has a defense that can play the scheme he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted

I really think we are gonna go Safety as much as we need LT.

Moehrig or Grant. If we are lucky we will get  Walker Little in the 3rd.

I would rather get Eichenburg/Jenkins/Radunz in the second and pick up another safety later. 
 

I trust Juston Burris more at FS than Cameron Erving at LT.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, woahfraze said:

Teven Jenkins.  I know his pass pro. isn't quite on the level as his run blocking, but oooeee, he is a road-grading mauler that plays with a mean streak in the run game. I know that might "sound" like a RT and not a LT, but I don't think he's incapable of playing on the left. Also, he's got to be better than who we have currently over there.  Obviously it would be nice for the team to give Moton a shot over at LT, where many feel he could also thrive.  But I don't think the Moton or the team have interest in screwing up a good thing, and he'll stay over on the right and continue to lock it down.  

Also, having Jenkins is insurance in case they can't reach an extension agreement with Moton.  If Moton leaves and Jenkins is better suited to RT, we can slide him over.

And we still have not tried Moton on the left side since RR left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sgt Schultz Grand Master

Sgt Schultz

Posted
Posted

OL, OL, and more OL would be nice.  I like Eichenberg in the 2nd round.  He is not Sewell or Slater right out of the blocks, but he looks as good as any option. 

But, I am not hard-over on him.....only that we get somebody who can play the position.  Then look for an IOL later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Looking Way Ahead, But.

      By TD alt · Posted

      That's likely going to tell the story. He'll have two weeks to prepare, so no excuses.
    • PantherChris
      Injuries

      By PantherChris · Posted

      You don't rotate offensive linemen dude shown me one time thats happened for us that wasnt because of a player leaving due to injury or a jumbo package ill wait.
    • tukafan21
      Looking Way Ahead, But.

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I didn't say I thought throwing it was a bad decision, I said I thought not running those 3-5 yard routes to pick up the 1st down wasn't a great call.  Yes the play worked out, but I didn't love the play call, it's like when a bad shooter is taking a 3 and you're yelling "no no no" as they're going up and then they make it so it worked out. That's still gambling on them to make the play and I take no issue with that. But I just went and watched the play again, we had T-Mac and XL running downfield crossing routes, Coker went in motion behind the LOS and then moved up a yard or two after the snap but not even past the LOS, Sanders chipped the DE and then ran a drag route right long the LOS. The play worked out, but I don't really like that particular play call and route tree with the game on the line on a 4th and 2.  If you want to send one route downfield as an option that's fine, but there were only 2 realistic target options with that route tree and they were both 15-20 yards downfield. This is just before Bryce is going to throw it.   You have 2 players off screen downfield, one player who ran a route that never had a chance to get open and didn't even get to the 1st down line, another player just at the line to gain but late in the route because of a chip (and the worst pass catcher of the 4). Do you really think that was a "good play call" in that situation? 
×
×
  • Create New...