Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Whatev said:

I don't think Moehrig will be there, but if he is the decision between best OT and Moehrig will be a tough one to make.  If you take Moehrig, do everything possible to trade back into the 2nd to get a quality OT.  

Only 6 teams pick prior to us so there is a good chance he’s there.

The run on EDGE guys and the 2 RB’s late 1st round last night was very much to our benefit. 

Rhule wanted more picks so maybe we trade back from #39

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the true smokescreen was screaming BPA and still "reaching" for a need.

I put reach in quotations because I don't think it was that much of a reach. I like the kid, but I could've been happier with another selection. Still ready to see what the defense will look like now that Phil Snow has a defense that can play the scheme he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think we are gonna go Safety as much as we need LT.

Moehrig or Grant. If we are lucky we will get  Walker Little in the 3rd.

I would rather get Eichenburg/Jenkins/Radunz in the second and pick up another safety later. 
 

I trust Juston Burris more at FS than Cameron Erving at LT.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, woahfraze said:

Teven Jenkins.  I know his pass pro. isn't quite on the level as his run blocking, but oooeee, he is a road-grading mauler that plays with a mean streak in the run game. I know that might "sound" like a RT and not a LT, but I don't think he's incapable of playing on the left. Also, he's got to be better than who we have currently over there.  Obviously it would be nice for the team to give Moton a shot over at LT, where many feel he could also thrive.  But I don't think the Moton or the team have interest in screwing up a good thing, and he'll stay over on the right and continue to lock it down.  

Also, having Jenkins is insurance in case they can't reach an extension agreement with Moton.  If Moton leaves and Jenkins is better suited to RT, we can slide him over.

And we still have not tried Moton on the left side since RR left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OL, OL, and more OL would be nice.  I like Eichenberg in the 2nd round.  He is not Sewell or Slater right out of the blocks, but he looks as good as any option. 

But, I am not hard-over on him.....only that we get somebody who can play the position.  Then look for an IOL later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeah, I can get a little of that.  But that's not what he is posting in his argument just now though.   He said people wouldn't even concede to the literal ability to do it when pressed on the literal ability.  I have never seen that.  He maintains it exists somewhere.  I mean, using anomaly games to make arguments about players just isn't the way.   There wasn't a defender within 10 yards of our guys on 2 of those 3 throws Sunday.  No one within 5 on the 3rd.   That's not Bryce Young answering questions about his play downfield..  That's Bryce Young taking advantage of coverage busts by a bad D.  Which hey, that's part of the game too.  Recognition and seeing the field.   It can't totally be dismissed.   That's still good play.  You want your QBs to make those plays.  But it's not getting into the long standing critique of BY IMO.   
    • Deserved, I wouldn’t use that word. Asked for? For sure. Am I upset over it? No.  People forget that AT was throwing his helmet in frustration last season over his QB’s ineptitude. The same QB was pretty inept to start this year, no guarantee AT would have helped him in those games any more than he did last year.  Just sayin.  And Dan doing him a solid probably did not go unnoticed by players around the league. I think it increases his rep with potential FAs. It sure can’t hurt it. 
    • You think that was the fault of the guy that was lighting it up or maybe the bums around him? Funnily enough, those bums are still being bums in his absence. Who would have thought!
×
×
  • Create New...