Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

45.9 is Darnold's best year, bro.

I have zero idea what point you’re trying to make here… Tannehill averaged 5 point higher QBR his first 3 years, therefore Sam cannot take a leap forward and become a solid starter? Help me connect your dots 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Did you see our roster?

Yeah and most of the prior year's roster went to Washington or Buffalo. Two teams that went to the playoffs.

Rivera was done here, it was obvious and his OC and DC were terrible. Just not sure we don't have the same thing all over again, but with a set of college coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaMan Mentor

PandaMan

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Not a bad pick. Both Moore and Anderson are only on one year deals. I suspect we'll pay Moore and let Anderson walk and take the comp pick. This kid seems like a natural replacement for Anderson.

Moore has 2 years left (we picked up his option), but yeah Robby only has one left.  Not against this pick at all.  Finally did something for Offense.  Now let’s get some a big man or two in the third 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
Just now, rico6 said:

Talent wise I’m cool with, but overall I agree with your sentiments. Panthers are drafting like they just won a super bowl. And not coming off back-to-back losing seasons

He's a great player, huge potential, but damn we have a lot of offensive weapons right now.

It's odd how much has changed from before. Before we had a quarterback carrying our offense, and now it looks like we're trying to build an offense that will carry the quarterback(s).

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
beo Grand Master

beo

Posted
Posted (edited)

not liking our 2nd round, I'm hoping for the best but trading back for a WR,  a spot we don't really need, after having a 1st round talent fall into your lap at 52 is questionable to me

Edited by beo
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      We had Sam Darnold

      By strato · Posted

      My uneducated eye saw him as close after Wilks got him back in. Wilks was very protective of him I thought, didn’t rush him and didn’t ask too much from him at first. I thought he let him get his feet under him. I will bet you Reich could really have helped him. Instead of making that trade and putting Sam out, we should have stayed with him with a real NFL coach. Reich was a good QB coach. You can call his offenses bland but he knew QBs.    I have been so angry with the team.. mainly Tepper I guess, for forcing this unnecessary hardship on us. 
    • MHS831
      We had Sam Darnold

      By MHS831 · Posted

      And timing is everything.  You don't build the roof of a house before you build the foundation.  Teams that draft #1 overall tend to go for QBs and put them in impossible situations.  Our coach sucked.  Our OL sucked (even when Cam was here, but he could overshadow that deficiency), etc.  They seem to have the idea down (Morgan?) but when Bryce gets paid, you can't have $100m going to the OL and $50m to the QB and still have WRs and a Defense.   We have to develop our talent and be prepared to let them walk and retool.  I am still a bit upset by the Horn CB deal.  Look at the salary we have locked up at OG and CB....Yikes. If it were not for MJackson and Coker, we would have been in deep poopie.   I am still fairly optimistic, and I have accepted the fact that Bryce will be our CB for at least another season.  He is improving, but I do not like the fact that he needs so much investment in the OL and WRs to be average--before his mega deal.  I am hoping we draft an QB with potential to develop on day 3 and see what we can do with him.  Long shot, but some of the top names in 2024 are going to be taken late this draft.  Like Purdy (I wanted him around round 5 or 6), or Ewers from last season.  I like several QBs who may not even be drafted, like the kid from Vanderbilt.  I also like Mateer from Oklahoma.  Raw, but a year on the bench could help.
    • LinvilleGorge
      Top 5 draft targets for positions of need

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We've still fuged up in the past going "BPA". We drafted Butler at DT and Shaq at LB when DT and LB were some of our biggest strengths of the roster. Butler was a flat out bust and Shaq was basically a JAG starter at LB. I know that triggers some folks, but sorry that's just the truth. We overdrafted him then doubled down on that and overpaid him.  
×
×
  • Create New...