Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Video highlights from Panthers minicamp


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Really good year for joint practices in training camp. The D looks legit now but if the Colts D look just as good we could be in for another rough year of QB play

Colts D was lights out last year(especially in the mid to late season) so unless they’ve regressed I wouldn’t use that as a measuring stick. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Offense being worse than the defense is the step back. Our O was pretty much fine last year except when things were clutch… the defense not so much. 
 

I assume most of the big assets weren’t in the rotation though in the scrimmages. 

Assuming the added weapons on offense, and add CMC, shouldn't they the offense be better from last year? Then wouldn't that mean a great step forward for the defense? 

The challenge is finding out which unit will be our identity.(assuming Defense, more Star Power)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

Offense being worse than the defense is the step back. Our O was pretty much fine last year except when things were clutch… the defense not so much. 
 

I assume most of the big assets weren’t in the rotation though in the scrimmages. 

It used to be well understood that offenses were behind defenses well in to training camp if not beyond. This is June. Rhule explained as much when he said OL isn't allowed to do much of anything that constitutes actual OL play.

What happened to things that used to be common knowledge ?

 

Edited by Moo Daeng
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...