Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tremble going to be the “Fullback”?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Since Mason Stokke was waived that just leaves Mikey Daniel. Since Tremble was more of a H-Back in college it would make sense and give flexibility to the roster. You could keep Tremble as the TE3/FB and add depth elsewhere.
 

Has anyone at camp seen Tremble playing the FB role or has it been mostly TE at camp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Well there’s no way we drafted him in the 4th rd to be a FB. I could see him getting snaps there with his skill set, but make no mistake about it. He’s a TE.

I think that's the exact reason we drafted him. 2 for 1

Edited by Moo Daeng
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule said today that they may or may not carry a fullback. After releasing the Wisconsin Kid, they signed Rod Smith yesterday, he has played some FB and they are looking at him there according to Rhule's comments. It seems that if If Smith or Daniel prove to be able to contribute on special teams we will probably have a roster spot for a FB. If not and another RB like Spencer Brown or Reggie Bonnafon can, then they'll take that spot and Tremble will be our main blocking back. Im not sure how they see Trenton Cannon since he's repping so much with the WR's but based on his special teams play I'd say he has one of those RB spots as well.

Edited by Michael G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I think that's the exact reason we drafted him. 2 for 1

I don’t disagree with that. But the way I interpreted this post is would FB be his position. And considering the rarity we ever even line up with a FB, I think it’s safe to say he’s a TE. And I believe he was drafted to be out TE2. 
 

I do think we will see him line up as a FB but I wouldn’t call him one. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Zod said:

I've only ever seen him play hback

This

i’ve always said he’s a H-Back (which he played at ND). 
can confuse people sometimes because get motioned into the backfield to block quite often

 

 

alao note.  There were people who compared him to Kittle.  Kittle played the same role at Iowa that Tremble did at Notre Dame.  The H-back

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...