Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What the Indianapolis Colts media is saying about the joint practice

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

NOTE: This topic is about what the Indy media is saying, therefore there may not be glowing reviews and rose colored glasses in regards to the Carolina Panthers. I am sure the coverage is slanted towards the Colts. I was just curious what the other guys were saying. 

 

Quote

 

Big Wins For D-Line

Carolina's offensive line is a bit banged up — center Matt Paradis wasn't participating — but they still have a roster of NFL players. And the Colts' defensive line absolutely dominated those drills, looking every bit as good against an opponent as they've looked throughout training camp so far.

 

 

Note: Joke's on you. The Panthers offensive line has been getting dominated in line drills all camp long. The good thing is the offensive line isn't a strictly one on one affair. While those drills show one on one skill, they don't really display what the line can do as a unit. 

 

A video of Shaq Thompson in coverage

Note: Shaq has missed a lot of camp and I am sure is still getting acclimated to football again. I have zero concern about this. 

 

Will Grier long ball. 

Note: Remember that the QB's must throw in these drills. They can't just run or throw the ball away. Sometimes QB's are also told who to throw to because the staff needs more film on them. 

 

 

Quote

 In 1-on-1 drills pitting the Panthers wide receivers vs. the Colts cornerbacks, the Panthers won by a score of 24 reps to 8. I scored an offensive win by a catch or penalty, and defensive wins by an incompletion or offensive penalty.

Note: Matt Rhule was disappointed in the Panthers receivers in team drills, but apparently they performed well in one on ones. 

 

Quote

 The Colts' defense set the tone early as they completely smothered the Panthers' offense. The field was littered with tackles for loss and takedowns near the line of scrimmage by the Colts. On one play, Panthers QB Sam Darnold found TE Dan Arnold about 15 yards along the left side and Colts S Andre Chachere was there to pop him and dislodge the ball for an incompletion. Later while the Colts were in heavy coverage, Darnold had all day to throw but couldn't find anyone as he tossed the ball to an open spot on the field, much to the delight of Colts LB Darius Leonard.

Note: Dan Arnold has looked great in camp, and I am appreciative of the Colts knocking the ball out of his hands in practice. Arnold strikes me of the kind of guy that will internalize that immediately and not let it happen again. 

 

Quote

It was another banner day for the Colts' young pass rushers. I had DE Ben Banogu with an unofficial tally of two run stuffs, three quarterback pressures, and a sack. Likewise, DEs Tyquan Lewis and Kemoko Turay combined for a sack and numerous pressures.

Note: I am praying Matt Rhule has some grand plan on how to make this talent-lacking offensive line perform at least average through scheme. It is possible, and I will be in awe if it happens. 

 

So what is the bottom line?

Honestly, it sounds to me like the Carolina Panthers just did not match the intensity of their hosts. Before the game the Coaches and the Captains talk about tone and how physical they will get. It is extremely subjective and I would bet the Panthers were caught a little off guard on how aggressive the Colts were. 

I am very interested in how the Panthers respond today. My gut tells me now that the tone has been set they will come out and perform much better. 

  • Pie 12
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

Let’s get our center back and find out which lineup works best pretty quickly. Repetition is going to be key to build trust and cohesiveness throughout our offensive line. I’m not saying we will be top of the league, but should be average with a great OT in Moton, decent C in Paradis, and enough competition for both OGs to have a solid player there. From what I read Moton at LT and Christensen at RT looked the best for the tackles. Moton, Daley/Elf, Paradis, Miller, and Christensen seems to make some sense. Christensen should get better as the season goes and Erving can be our overpriced backup at any position really. If Christensen struggles, Scott can step in and be serviceable.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Zod said:

Note: I am praying Matt Rhule has some grand plan on how to make this talent-lacking offensive line perform at least average through scheme. It is possible, and I will be in awe if it happens. 

 

They overperformed last year with a quick release.  On paper, it looked worse than any Cam ever had.  Yet we were top 10 in pass pro.  Run grade is a different matter, so a little below average overall.  

Now maybe it was a fluke, or maybe they know what their doing.  I guess we'll see.

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivan The Awesome Mentor

Ivan The Awesome

Posted
Posted

From the vids I've been seeing the past hour, Omar Bayless is that hidden gem that is shining a lot tbh. Terrence Marshall Jr as well which is so satisfying because the WR corp seems to be the huge strength. Something that hasn't been true for years. Meaning Darnold is set up for success. Also makes Robby Anderson a piece that can be moved to bolster some other part of the team that needs help, like that O-line. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
39 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

They overperformed last year with a quick release.  On paper, it looked worse than any Cam ever had.  Yet we were top 10 in pass pro.  Run grade is a different matter, so a little below average overall.  

Now maybe it was a fluke, or maybe they know what their doing.  I guess we'll see.

Never forget, we actually went into a season with Byron Bell at LT and Nate Chandler at RT by PLAN. Not due to some forced desperation due to rash of injury.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 3
  • The D 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

No mention of how the colts offense did against the Panthers defense? Because with the garbage the Colts have at QB I bet the Panthers D looked decent at least. 

All the reports I read said the Colts QBs looked pretty good

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, hepcat said:

No mention of how the colts offense did against the Panthers defense? Because with the garbage the Colts have at QB I bet the Panthers D looked decent at least. 

At one point yesterday, one QB had went 10/11 and the other QB had went 7/10. Multiple TDs. No INTs that I can recall.

It wasn't pretty.

Keep in mind, Indy is in a panic right now about their backup QB situation because they suck and Wentz is out with injury. We made them look good.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, hepcat said:

No mention of how the colts offense did against the Panthers defense? Because with the garbage the Colts have at QB I bet the Panthers D looked decent at least. 

Their backup QB's (that's all they have right now) torched us in red zone.  Over and over again.  Overall, I think they were very, very good stat-wise.  I think no ints.

Edited by Luciu5
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...