Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the Jaguars are showcasing Gardner Minshew, plenty of teams should be interested


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mav1234 said:

Minshew MAY be better than Darnold.

But if he is, he still doesn't seem like he's likely to be good enough to be a franchise kind of QB. 

He also may not be.  The bet on Darnold is about potential, not play so far, and it's hard to argue Minshew has more potential than Darnold.

I'd rather fail with Darnold than suffer with Minshew, now that he's our QB.  And if Darnold is as bad as some fear, he might just help us get our next QB.

That's the thing. We know Minshew can play well in the NFL because he has. Darnold's instances of competent NFL play have been pretty limited. But Darnold clearly has a higher ceiling than Minshew, although a far lower floor. 

Minshew is an attractive option for us because there is no Plan B in 2021 if Darnold shits the bed. That said, I don't think the odds of him being our answer for this future would be very high. He's just a reasonable solution to a potential 2021 problem.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

But Darnold clearly has a higher ceiling than Minshew, although a far lower floor. 

All joking aside, what's the bull case for Darnold having a "higher ceiling" than Minshew?

Is it simply based on their respective draft positions?  (Sam #3, Minshew 6th round)

Darnold has 38 starts with 45 TD's and 39 INT's.

The Swashbuckler projects at 70 TD's and 21 INT's over course of 38 starts

(he has 20 starts w/ 37 TD's and 11 INT's).

 

 

 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

That's the thing. We know Minshew can play well in the NFL because he has. Darnold's instances of competent NFL play have been pretty limited. But Darnold clearly has a higher ceiling than Minshew, although a far lower floor. 

Minshew is an attractive option for us because there is no Plan B in 2021 if Darnold shits the bed. That said, I don't think the odds of him being our answer for this future would be very high. He's just a reasonable solution to a potential 2021 problem.

I don't think worst case scenario is Darnold isn't competent and we have a bad season. I think worst case is a season in which we win enough games to be out of position to have our pick of a few QBs and we still don't have an answer at QB because of whomever played not being the answer .

 

But I agree backup qb seems a big problem overall .  I'm all in for Darnold now.  I would like a veteran backup on waivers, but Minshew isn't that.  If he really would be totally dirt cheap then maybe, but I don't want to invest more draft capital in long shots after Darnold.

As to the potential, that relates to physical strengths. Minshew isn't terrible in those regards,and has played a lot better than Darnold mostly, but he really isn't physically gifted and while it's certainly early enough for us to be wrong, he just doesn't seem like he's a long term solution at QB. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

He was not good. Stop it. 

the bar is what we have.

Minshew has been better in the NFL than Darnold.  I don't buy an arguement that Darnold has a higher ceiling either. 

I mean, we aren't getting Minshew.   But if all things we even and you got the option to pick one....Minshew is the better gamble.  But if gambling on one is all your actual plan is....well, that remains a bad plan. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minshew was pretty good but we just spent two seasons complaining about QBs without sufficient arm strength.  Yes, Teddy had issues going deep beyond that, but Minshew doesn't have anything close to Darnold's arm.  There was some debate about this pre draft... And I was surprised when I did some digging into their advanced stats now much closer Minshew and Teddy were than I expected in terms of depth of targets and what not.  But Minshew 'feels' in game situations more willing to take risks than Teddy did.

Plus, Minshew had pretty much the same percent of bad throws as Darnold, far fewer drops, about the same percent of on target passes, and a couple yards less depth to his average attempt thru each of their first two years.  Now I agree advanced stats can be misleading, and Minshew did play better with a better cast around him.  A much better one lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I don't see where the Panthers have the resources to make a competitive offer to the Jaguars. I wouldn't want to give up a 1st for Minshew, who would hopefully be a backup QB, and we don't have a second round (or a fourth round) pick. Those belong to the Jets after the Darnold trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the hypothetical situation where Minshew became a Panther, does anyone here really believe that Rhule would play Minshew over Sam after the Panthers gave up a good deal to get him(Darnold)?

QB Competition?  LOL.   That's a good one.   😁

Let's be honest with ourselves....In Rhule's eyes, there wouldn't be a competition except at Backup where Minshew would easily beat out PJ. 

He's hitched his Wagon to Sam for all intents and purposes. 

Let's see if that Wagon gets to its desired destination.

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Minshew was pretty good but we just spent two seasons complaining about QBs without sufficient arm strength.  Yes, Teddy had issues going deep beyond that, but Minshew doesn't have anything close to Darnold's arm.  There was some debate about this pre draft... And I was surprised when I did some digging into their advanced stats now much closer Minshew and Teddy were than I expected in terms of depth of targets and what not.  But Minshew 'feels' in game situations more willing to take risks than Teddy did.

Plus, Minshew had pretty much the same percent of bad throws as Darnold, far fewer drops, about the same percent of on target passes, and a couple yards less depth to his average attempt thru each of their first two years.  Now I agree advanced stats can be misleading, and Minshew did play better with a better cast around him.  A much better one lol

A risk taker with a sub par arm? Sounds like the opposite of what most were pining for. This is not a guy to trade for other than a very late rounder to be a backup.  That's not going to happen.

 

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/jaguars-quarterback-gardner-minshew-potential-future-jacksonville/

Quote

To start with, Minshew’s arm strength is substandard for an NFL quarterback. That’s part of the reason he was drafted in the sixth round despite having a phenomenal senior season at Washington State. It is an unfortunate fact of life for NFL quarterbacks that arm strength is something that truly great players cannot do without. There is a certain point at which a player’s arm is simply too weak for them to be an elite quarterback. Now, Minshew’s arm isn’t quite that poor, but it is undeniably below the level of the NFL’s best players at the position.

 

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/film-room/2020/film-room-gardner-minshew

Quote

Due to the limitations of his arm strength and modest mobility, Minshew is unlikely to be a true game-changer. The deep passing, tight-window skills, and dual-threat capabilities required to be a legitimate game-changer may not ever be there with Minshew. Last weekend's game did not give him much of a chance to prove any developments in those areas, either.

 

Edited by Moo Daeng
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

That's the thing. We know Minshew can play well in the NFL because he has. Darnold's instances of competent NFL play have been pretty limited. But Darnold clearly has a higher ceiling than Minshew, although a far lower floor. 

Minshew is an attractive option for us because there is no Plan B in 2021 if Darnold shits the bed. That said, I don't think the odds of him being our answer for this future would be very high. He's just a reasonable solution to a potential 2021 problem.

Honestly, I don't want a Plan B if Darnold sh*ts the bed this year. Minshew would keep us in draft purgatory. If Darnold is truly a bust then let him get us a high draft pick.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

All joking aside, what's the bull case for Darnold having a "higher ceiling" than Minshew?

Is it simply based on their respective draft positions?  (Sam #3, Minshew 6th round)

Darnold has 38 starts with 45 TD's and 39 INT's.

The Swashbuckler projects at 70 TD's and 21 INT's over course of 38 starts

(he has 20 starts w/ 37 TD's and 11 INT's).

 

 

 

Darnold does have top tier arm talent and some ability to make something out of nothing. More than Minshew, IMO.

Don't get me wrong, Minshew has been leaps and bounds a better NFL QB to date but the top end for Darnold is actually high.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...