Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No chance


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I never say no chance. Every year there's a couple of teams that way over perform expectations and a couple that way underperform and the injury bug often has a lot of say.

Bingo. I’d highly bet against us pre but every year when the season starts all bets are off and let’s go fugging panthers. Keep pounding. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I never say no chance. Every year there's a couple of teams that way over perform expectations and a couple that way underperform and the injury bug often has a lot of say.

I’m putting 10 on under 7.5 for the Panthers and 10  on over 9 wins for the Steelers. Same bets as last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is pretty accurate. Bottom 6 of the league is definitely our arena. It was around bottom 10 of the league but that got fuged up averaging 5.7 wins over the last 3 seasons.

Objectively speaking and looking at the NFL and having to pick 6 teams I’d probably pick the Panthers as well, tbh. 

The deep bottom dwellers a couple years ago have surfaced with promising QBs and other moves (Browns, Bengals, Jags, Chargers etc) and it’s a shuffle down at the bottom between the Lions, Raiders, Jets Texans and yea…Panthers.

Dear lord don’t let us be the new age Browns.

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, onmyown said:

This is pretty accurate. Bottom 6 of the league is definitely our arena. It was around bottom 10 of the league but that got fuged up averaging 5.7 wins over the last 3 seasons.

Objectively speaking and looking at the NFL and having to pick 6 teams I’d probably pick the Panthers as well, tbh. 

The deep bottom dwellers a couple years ago have surfaced with promising QBs and loves (Browns, Bengals, Jags, Chargers etc) and it’s a shuffle down at the bottom between the Lions, Raiders, Jets and yea…Panthers.

Dear lord don’t let us be the new age Browns.

The Jets are 100% the new browns. 
 

Maybe we’re just the new Bucs(before Brady)?

Edited by Tbe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree it is more about the OL. If you happen to have a world beater with a great OL then that’s better obviously but you don’t need to have that.  Capable and durable guys that can get to the second level with good blocking can be plenty.  
    • I think Gibbs is special, but you’re right, some of the top investments have proven to not be much different than some 2nds and 3rds. Taylor for example is on an MVP level season. James Cook is doing better than Breece Hall for example. Raiders weren’t in a good spot to draft Jeanty. Same with the Falcons/Bijan.  You gotta swing at the right time — the investment shouldn’t come too early. You almost have to stumble into a guy mid to late rounds while building or find that guy to put you over the top when the team is finally well rounded.
    • Like I said in another post yesterday, the handling of the offensive line by Fitterer and mostly Morgan has been crazy. We've spent way too much money(Lewis and Hunt) to keep Bryce upright instead of using our picks in the 2nd round on JPJ and Frazier. Could have kept an injured Corbett at guard, Brady at swing, and still taken Maye as a backup, sorry Zavala. We wouldn't have taken XL, but XL hasn't been as advertised anyway, and Brooks hasn't contributed anything. Moton's extension with it's signing bonus made him uncutable. Icky's contract was due at the same time Bryce's 3rd year ended, and we all know it's extension or 5th year, and if we're going to do a 5th year, he's going to want the extension.  To me the whole thing is just ridiculous. Right now, depending on if Tepper decides to keep Bryce, it feels like we're going to have to choose between Icky and a Bryce extension. Maybe he plays on the 5th year, but I think he'll want the big money guarantee.  JMO, but if you took a look at how the contracts could potentially fall, the writing was on the wall that this could be a cash flow nightmare. Too many contract guarantees, not enough rookie contracts to offset the upcoming paydays. 
×
×
  • Create New...