Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers and WR Robby Anderson have agreed to a 2-year, $29.5 million extension, per source.

SgtJoo

By SgtJoo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Actually if you look.  I’m not sure it will effect this.

DJs rookie deal won’t end until after 2022 and new deal wouldn’t kick in until 2023.

Robby’s deal ends after 2023.  So only 1 year you’d have to puzzle the cap

Ya but extending him now before he’s the most loaded WR in football is out the window. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Can we please get a roll call of all the dopes spreading the "Robby doesn't want to be here" conspiracy theories?

You know who you are.

the "conspiracy theory", or at least one I was aware of,  was Robby didn't want to play football this season without a new deal.   Here is the deal. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
Just now, CAPantherFan said:

Panthers & Robby Anderson have agreed to a two-year extension, league source confirms. 

Some details on numbers, per source:
$12.5m in 2021 (added $4.5m)
$13m in 2022
$12m in 2023

$20.5m guaranteed.

Essentially a three-year/$37.5m deal ($12.5m AAV)

Still too high. He’s a 6-8 million WR. Let him go test the market. He’ll be back. 

  • Poo 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
Just now, CAPantherFan said:

Panthers & Robby Anderson have agreed to a two-year extension, league source confirms. 

Some details on numbers, per source:
$12.5m in 2021 (added $4.5m)
$13m in 2022
$12m in 2023

$20.5m guaranteed.

Essentially a three-year/$37.5m deal ($12.5m AAV)

I thought he was at $10M this year, not $8M? Very happy we're putting some of the extension on this year's cap. Great contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khaki Lackey Mentor

Khaki Lackey

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

Nice. This ensures having a great starting trio for the next 3 years. I don't think it is any accident that this length of contract coincides with DJ needing a new deal and Terrace developing. I like it.

Exactly. We're slightly overpaying, but it fits into the long term plan IMO.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, t96 said:

Also probably some incentives baked in there, the initial number reported is always higher than the real number. Wouldn't be surprised if his cap hits are closer to $12-13M/year (on average, I'm sure the structure will be different).

It's why I always disagree with everyone that says the Matt KAlil Deal was the worst deal in our team's history. They always claim it was 50 million, but it was only 25 guaranteed. It wasn't a good deal by any stretch of the imagination, but it wasn't as crippling as everyone painted it to be.

The Teddy deal on the other hand, absolute garbage.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
Just now, ncfan said:

You can still extend him now.  His new deal just wouldn’t start until 2023.

this is what happened with CMC

Extending means the new deal incorporates boosts into the existing deal. It happened to CMC much more akin to Robby. But if Robby gets X, DJ who is an elite talent is going to want XXX. That’s the issue. 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

15M a year for Robby? This is absolute trash. He’s worth 6-8M a year at the best. Welcome Hurney 2.0. Ffs. 

 

15 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

this is basically he’s gone writing on the wall. 

I agree with both. This is why he stayed away and was not showing up so much. Cried about wanting more money, sucks.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • LinvilleGorge
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
    • BlazeCarolina
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By BlazeCarolina · Posted

      On Panther's Wire too. No idea, just found it and trying to share. https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/06/15/nfl-free-agency-rumors-panthers-eagles-justin-simmons/84219881007/
×
×
  • Create New...