Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you be upset if Sam was KC version of Alex Smith?


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CRA said:

KC’s Alex Smith but in a Panther uniform….was Teddy Bridgewater. 

if that is the case the coaches shouldn’t of made it so keeping Teddy was impossible.  Teddy Bridgewater is a much better Alex Smith than Darnold can strive to be.  It’s in his DNA be like Alex Smith. 

Seems like the question is…is it okay for Sam to be like Teddy.  

That's actually not the case.  In his time in KC, Smith was much more willing to air it out.

In fact, TB5's "best" season barely beats out Smith's worst FULL season.

Smith is a far better QB than Teddy.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I was under the impression it was "franchise QB" or bust?1?

Alex Smith has certainly never been viewed as a "franchise QB" by huddle denizens...

Anyone that would be happy with a ceiling of Alex Smith has lowered their expectations. Alex Smith's a nice backup--was a nice backup.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

KC’s Alex Smith but in a Panther uniform….was Teddy Bridgewater. 

if that is the case the coaches shouldn’t of made it so keeping Teddy was impossible.  Teddy Bridgewater is a much better Alex Smith than Darnold can strive to be.  It’s in his DNA be like Alex Smith. 

Seems like the question is…is it okay for Sam to be like Teddy.  

 

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

That's actually not the case.  In his time in KC, Smith was much more willing to air it out.

In fact, TB5's "best" season barely beats out Smith's worst FULL season.

Smith is a far better QB than Teddy.

Yup. Watched Smith for years here in KC and Teddy is a second tier Alex Smith. Same style and same mental limitations with being conservative. Smith had a better arm and better leadership, but ultimately that same nature capped his ceiling.

With respect to the question, not really. Smith didn't have what it took to get the team over the hump without an elite defense, and the team needs to shoot better than that or be at constant risk of Garoppolo-led San Fran-type performances. For example, Denver's elite defense was beatable in the 2015 Super Bowl with better coaching; that game wasn't as lopsided as fans like to make it sound, even with the ugly plays Carolina had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, BrianS said:

That's actually not the case.  In his time in KC, Smith was much more willing to air it out.

In fact, TB5's "best" season barely beats out Smith's worst FULL season.

Smith is a far better QB than Teddy.

Alex Smith was always the best Teddy comp that existed.  

Alex Smith wouldn't pull the trigger in KC and ultimately that is why they parted with him.  They are both naturally risk adverse QBs that opt for the checkdown/ safe play.  Too hard to win with a QB like that.  With is why Andy parted with him.   

Is Alex Smith better than Teddy? When he was healthy? Sure.  But that doesn't change the fact Teddy is a similar QB.   

Why would anyone want Sam to be a version of that?  Could of just kept the sure thing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a good solid QB that can can step up from time to time and win and game by himself. Not every game. Darnold might have that. Teddy didn't.

Build a winning franchise by having a consistent winner every year, like the Ravens or Steelers that has a chance to be in the playoffs every year. Once you make it to the dance, you just might win one or two. 

Also, it's not easy finding a franchise QB (what is there maybe 5 to 7 in the NFL right now?). We had Cam and then injuries made him mortal and the team was not built strong enough to stay a consistent winner after that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

If he was able to have the success(team winning wise) that Smith was in KC, abso-fuging-lutely. We have never even had back to back winning seasons. That would be the most successful period in franchise history and would be a big step forward in establishing us as a contending team.

We can always go get another guy when the opportunity presents itself(like Mahomes) but that would be a massive step.

Let's be honest, if he came in and performed like Alex Smith did with the Chiefs (5 winning seasons in a row) he'd be the best QB to ever suit up for the Panthers. 

But once again it's more people disrespecting how good a QB Alex Smith was more than anything. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Alex Smith was always the best Teddy comp that existed.  

Alex Smith wouldn't pull the trigger in KC and ultimately that is why they parted with him.  They are both naturally risk adverse QBs that opt for the checkdown/ safe play.  Too hard to win with a QB like that.  With is why Andy parted with him.   

Is Alex Smith better than Teddy? When he was healthy? Sure.  But that doesn't change the fact Teddy is similar QB. 

 

 

No, wrong again.

Smith's last year in KC he averaged 8.6 air yards per attempt, with a 67.5% completion rate.  By way of comparison, Mahomes last year averaged 8.9 air yards per attempt, with a 66% completion rate.

Need more?  Ok.  Look at Tyreek Hill.  In Hill's first season starting, Smith's last season in KC, Hill had his second highest yards per reception and his highest yards per target over his career.

I am in no way saying Smith is close to Mahomes.  What I'm illustrating here is that KC parted with Alex Smith because they had an absolutely GENERATIONAL talent on their hands and after the years Smith had in KC, he was clearly not a backup.

Not saying I would want an Alex Smith here, but the comparisons to TB5 are grossly wrong.  TB5 doesn't come close.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BrianS said:

No, wrong again.

Smith's last year in KC he averaged 8.6 air yards per attempt, with a 67.5% completion rate.  By way of comparison, Mahomes last year averaged 8.9 air yards per attempt, with a 66% completion rate.

Need more?  Ok.  Look at Tyreek Hill.  In Hill's first season starting, Smith's last season in KC, Hill had his second highest yards per reception and his highest yards per target over his career.

I am in no way saying Smith is close to Mahomes.  What I'm illustrating here is that KC parted with Alex Smith because they had an absolutely GENERATIONAL talent on their hands and after the years Smith had in KC, he was clearly not a backup.

Not saying I would want an Alex Smith here, but the comparisons to TB5 are grossly wrong.  TB5 doesn't come close.

They drafted Mahomes because they'd already determined that Smith wasn't going to get them where they wanted to be and fully intended to move on at that time. Like Teddy, Smith did not throw for many TDs, once going 21 straight games without throwing a TD to a WR in that Reid KC offense, and only hit his career high 26 when Mahomes was drafted and the writing was on the wall. Prior to that he had 23, 18, 20, and 15 TDs thrown and never broke 20 in San Fran. Mahomes, on the other hand, has thrown for 50, 26, and 38. Smith is absolutely a slightly better version of Teddy from the same mold. They may be 'starters' but that doesn't mean much if they can't beat the best competition.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • take a  look around the league at other young Qb's around Bryce Young's age group  such as Drake Maye , Jayden Daniels, Bo Nix , CJ Stroud  & Caleb Williams who at the time like Bryce Young they also were drafted also joined teams with a losing record .the only difference with these Qb's is after joining their teams with a losing record they led those same teams to a winning record in a very short period of time .it's simply what you call a game changer & or elite Qb's & then take a  look at  the other side of the coin you have Qb's such as Trey Lance, Zach Wilson, Mac Jones, Justin Fields  & Anthony Richardson also like Bryce Young all first round picks who instead of winning either did not play or led their teams to a losing record while playing  just because Bryce Young was a #1 overall pick does not necessarily mean that he will become improve with time if history tells you anything it's matter of fact just the opposite . lBryce Young who has an overall record of 14-30 & wildly inconsistent & never in the history pf the NFL has a Qb 5'10" or shorter had a successful carrer as Qb in the NFL  you have to ignore alot of FACTS & be really ignorant to the FACT to think Bryce Young is the future at Qb if anything history is telling you exactly what ?..just saying
    • The only answer 
    • to me these two signings were so bad for the Panthers at the time of our young team. "Sean Gilbert was signed by the Carolina Panthers on April 21, 1998, after being traded from the Washington Redskins in a deal that sent the Panthers two first-round picks (Nos. 5 and 12) to Washington. The Panthers then re-signed Gilbert to a 7-year, $46.5 million contract extension on the same date"  The other was Jason Peters being picked in the First round of the 1998 draft. "Peter played for the Panthers from 1998 to 2001, appearing in 38 games (starting 20) and recording 88 total tackles, 7.5 sacks, and 1 fumble recovery His NFL career was cut short by a chronic neck stinger, forcing him to retire after the 2001 season   
×
×
  • Create New...