Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most vulnerable positions to waiver/free agency.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I really don't know. Some of the cuts we made were a little head scratching. Seems like when we think the staff/FO is gonna zig they zag. 

Don't really even mean that so much as shade as I don't think we really have enough info on what their master plan or tendencies are yet. It's sometimes hard to predict what their priorities are.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I really don't know. Some of the cuts we made were a little head scratching. Seems like when we think the staff/FO is gonna zig they zag. 

Don't really even mean that so much as shade as I don't think we really have enough info on what their master plan or tendencies are yet. It's sometimes hard to predict what their priorities are.

Which cuts are you questioning ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mc52beast said:

Definitely the o-line, LB, possibly safety and RB

RB and LB would likely be the easiest spots to shore up quick. 

It's going to be rough to really add OL talent at this stage.   Given the talent level of the likely potential adds...guys already here knowing the offense and existing chemistry is going to carry some weight.  Even if we don't love them IMO.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...