Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post Jets Game - Biggest areas of concern


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, bababoey said:

I don't know if anyone noticed this or not but Heartsfield left the game in the early part of the 3rd quarter.  When he left the game the Jets had something like 80 yards of offense in the game.  Our defense was mixing coverages on almost ever play.  After he left we put Chandler in at safety and Chinn moved to nickle.  The Jets scored 14 points and had almost 200 yards of offense.  We played exclusively zone after Heartsfield left.  If he can't play next week this defense becomes much more predictable.  Just saying.

It because our backups are not up to par.  If we have injuries in the secondary this season expect more of the same.   

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

When he is on a Roll he's not bad but it was sad to see him running the same plays that worked in the 1st half when it was clear NYJ made adjustments.

A good OC will figure out what adjustments were made and call different plays.

O-line was shaky but only gave up one sack against a pretty good front 4.  I agree that it is still our biggest concern. 

Unfortunately our coaching staff looks like the one that just left. Struggles with adjustments and wants to sit on leads instead of going for the freaking jugular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Kicking/lack of confidence in the kicking game. I wouldn't be surprised to see us cut Santoso and try develop him on the practice squad.

2) O-line is outmatched. We will have to scheme around it all season.

Honorable Mention) Pass coverage was leaky. Whenever we didn't get pressure it was almost always a completion or a drop.

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How the Panthers adjust their play style after the half with a lead.. I would love to Panthers to stay aggressive,  try to increase the lead instead of playing it safe and hopefully ride out the clock with safe play calling.. I guess this would fall on coaching.

And I have to agree that we need to keep improving our offensive line someway, somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Joe Brady inside the 20s and playcalling with the lead.

And...

RhuleRivera.jpg.4f3ff16961f4390b38a951d60e989c6a.jpg

That trick with the glasses is so accurate, another coach who can't get out of his own way, i.e. Grier in Dallas, Brady and Snow as coordinators, Walker as backup. And were Slye's problems a bad coaching problem? (he was very good today).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chinn at mostly FS I dont especially like.  He did fine for the most part but he definitely wasnt able to put his stamp on the game like he did most games last year.   I think it takes a lot of his strengths away and highlights some of the things he isnt quite as strong at.  Its only one game though so we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back and watching some plays i just dont see how Pat Elflein makes it the rest of the season...hell even half way. Had consistent trouble hold his block and getting lifted drove into the backfield. If it wasnt for darnold getting rid of the ball so quick he would have gotten hit way more than he did.

And if you think im exaggerating watch darnolds highlights and key in on Elfleins reps. He is that bad.

 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...