Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule explains deactivating Deonte Brown


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

Who knows. We drafted a LS over Trey Smith who had a fantastic RAS score at 321 pounds (not blown off the blocks like Elf). KC got a heckuva steal. Still love the draft before this gaffe but I still can’t comprehend how we were so confident in Erving, Elflein, Paradis and Miller that we only needed BC and Brown, especially when we knew Brown might not even been ready to be active. We best be going OL heavy next year, no excuses.

image.png.8d7d50afe8672e049c583fe8c4497c7c.png

At this point you need to change your user name to Trey Smith.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Floppin said:

Underrated comment. This is exactly the reason.

The staff doesn't see him as versatile enough to be one of the active three OL backups. 

When they're ready to start him is likely when he will be active and only then.

The prob is he's better than 3 of our back ups and really needs to have time to gel. I'm guessing that his weight might be a bigger factor than its being let on because he's a really good guard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OldhamA said:

He was impressive in the pre-season against backups.

This narrative is mental - you've whipped yourselves up into a frenzy over a 6th round RG. It's baffling. 

Chinn, Brown, YGM, Pride and Roy all started at points last season. Horn and Marshall have started this with Tremble and Nixon seeing serious minutes. Hell even Franklin and Hartsfield started last year. 

The best players play. Period.

Right now our highly paid, highly experienced HC and Coaching staff don't think Brown is the best guy. They're the ones that see them practice each day!

This is a great post.  LOTS of our rookies are playing last year and this.  That makes me think Brown's rookie status has nothing to do with him not playing.  He's not good enough yet to start, and isn't versatile enough to backup, makes more sense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I try to make at least one post a day about him. What’s amazing is that the opportunity presents itself a lot. Based on the OL play, I think I may be able to continue this until week 10 at least. I think about week 11 if the OL sucks threads are still there that the interest in the season will wane and I’ll have to stop.

Now, if we have 4 or less wins at week 13, the pre-draft threads will start popping up. Pretty sure I’ll be able to find a ton of talk about wanting to draft OL and I can pepper those threads with talk about the all-rookie OL that we passed over for a LS. 

I appreciate the commitment to the bit. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He dropped 34 pounds from Senior bowl to draft.  WTF does Rhule expect.  Put his big ass on the field if he gets tired.  Sub him out for a series or two. 

Rhule doesn't get it,  Running game is #1.  Brown is clearly the guy you want in the running game.  Open up some damn holes and that opens the play action and wide open receivers.

MATT RHULE stop playing college football and join the NFL. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, stbugs said:

Who knows. We drafted a LS over Trey Smith who had a fantastic RAS score at 321 pounds (not blown off the blocks like Elf). KC got a heckuva steal. Still love the draft before this gaffe but I still can’t comprehend how we were so confident in Erving, Elflein, Paradis and Miller that we only needed BC and Brown, especially when we knew Brown might not even been ready to be active. We best be going OL heavy next year, no excuses.

image.png.8d7d50afe8672e049c583fe8c4497c7c.png

popped in to read about stbugs undying love for trey smith.  was not disappointed.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

Then why draft him   If Rhule values conditioning and versatility, that’s not Brown 

He was drafted in the 6th. That's typically where you draft projects, not starters. I'm guessing they saw his performance in college and thought with better conditioning he could be a player in the NFL. They're probably right. It's still early in the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Snake said:

The prob is he's better than 3 of our back ups and really needs to have time to gel. I'm guessing that his weight might be a bigger factor than its being let on because he's a really good guard. 

Yes, but again he's only better than the backups at his position specifically. He's not versatile enough to have active as a backup so until the team is ready to make him the starter he will, baring some more injuries, be inactive on game day. He's not jelling by sitting the bench regardless and he would be limiting the team's options in the event of an injury on the line that wasn't his specific position.

He's still getting work in practice obviously. 

Edited by Floppin
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...