Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady Christensen didn't trip himself.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Zod said:

image.png

 

Erving stepped on his left foot making Brady fall backwards. It looked like he tripped on his own feet initially. 

Nice photo.  I am relieved.  Although I look at this photo, and I see some positives and negatives.

Cam's form is good.  Christensen's feet are too close together--maybe because 320 lbs was on one them.  Miller needs better arm extension and more knee bend and less waist bend.  Paradis looks good--he gets in trouble when they bull rush him and he is in good shape vs. the bull rush.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panther'sBigD said:

It looks like he was hesitating a little bit and was slow getting to wherever he should have been, and that's when Erving got manhandled right over top of him. He'll get it figured out once the game starts to slow down. He's definitely got the physical tools. 

Yeah, it's like young guys in college getting their first reps. You generally need somewhere between 100-200 live snaps before a linemen really starts having things slow down for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Panfan35 said:

When they had Brady at Lt and brown at LG in the preseason they looked real solid pancaking guys 

They are. As long as the are up against equal talent they can and will hold their own. The level of competition has gone up a notch though since those preseason games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...