Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this the best Panthers pass rush in franchise history?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, CRA said:

you can nitpick anything....his overall resume is what it is.  He has put 3 different teams in the top 5 defensively.   If that isn't a good DC, then I don't know what one is.   Ron was the same way.  Multiple teams and did it in multiple schemes.  The fact they suck as HCs is overpromotion....which you see often in sports. 

and it's the present day NFL.  The entire league is too comically catered to aid the offense against a defense.  So defenses are going to get got.  

Maybe they're starting slow, because right now WFT has the 31st ranked D.  In fact, the Bills, Chargers and Giants have their BEST offensive games so far this season against the WFT.  The Giants for instance had 346 yards of offense against Atlanta, but 391 against WFT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a difference between comparing individual 2-man teams of rushers, and comparing unit pressure.

In the latter case, this is developing into an historic defense.  Not just Panther history, either.

The reason is that we've assembled a group of fast, versatile players, who can rush the passer or drop in coverage, without the OL having a clue who to block.

Pressure from all directions.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll have a better picture after the Dallas game. This group will seriously enter the conversation if - even if we end up losing - whack Dak like a pinata. Forget the stats; I don't recall our pass rush being this violent against opposing quarterbacks. That and it's not where our opponents can focus on just one or two guys either. Whatever we're doing is giving just about everyone a shot at the quarterback at some point, via skill and/or design. The question is whether we can sustain this or whether injuries/opponents getting smarter will set us back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, jfra78 said:

Del Rio was special, too bad we couldn't hold onto him

DelRio has that Norv Turner syndrome, great coordinator, doodoo HC… proven…

 

Hardy was a beast in ‘13, but 15 sacks is misleading… 8 through 14 games, 7 in last 2..granted those 2 were Ryan & Brees, much needed division wins but still.. loved Greg way back but let’s be real…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OldhamA said:

As individual talents, no.

As a unit, quite possibly. We'll see what happens when teams start adjusting to what we're doing as a scheme (we're stressing protections).

I wouldn't say this team is far off from it in the individual talents area... name a more individually talented team.. and still it's early 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say it's too early to say -- possibly but probably not. Our pass rush in 2013 carried the defense to a top 2 and frankly historic season. That secondary was a bunch of nobodies who didn't have to cover very long since our pass rush was getting home so fast. Secondary was a weakness masked by the elite pass rush that year.

 

This year's sack numbers and pass rush have definitely been benefited by our secondary actually being a strength so far this year. With Horn out they'll have a real test ahead of them, even with the CJ addition. We've gotten a fair amount of coverage sacks this year, which are awesome but partly due to the secondary rather than our elite pass rush. But even still our pass rush is the strength of the D. Just not sure yet if it's on 2013's level or surpasses it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this years secondary has been aiding the pass rush. Which isn’t something you could really say for prior teams.

2013’s 4 man front was probably the best we’ve seen in terms of consistent in your face pressure.

This years team has a better rush in totality if you factor in the talent plus the scheme. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree. I’d make the move because I don’t see us sniffing the playoffs and let’s be honest TMac, Legette and Coker better be our top 3 future. If they aren’t and we need Thielen to replace one of them, then we need to draft yet another 1st round WR, SMH. Suffice it to say, Thielen isn’t good enough to get us into the playoffs so let’s get the young guys starting so we know if they aren’t good enough. We still have so many assumptions about whether players are who we need them to be that holding onto Thielen for 3-7 wins isn’t worth passing on a mid round pick (3rd to 5th/swaps). We’ve had some success with later round picks/UDFAs and need depth.
    • If you move Thielen I think you almost have to keep Renfrow. You need some sort of veteran presence in the locker room and Renfrow would be good insurance in the slot. I'm sure we have Coker penciled in to start there but you also have to be keeping Coker in the back of your head as XL insurance on the outside if he doesn't step up. If he flounders again, I wouldn't wait too awfully long to replace him with Coker outside and slide Renfrow into the slot and keep it moving. 
    • Playing the same role is different than having the same style.  Cam Newton and Drew Brees both played QB but arent the same type in any way.
×
×
  • Create New...