Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold press conference after Philidelphia game


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

"Did not play well enough today that's just what it boils down to for me personally.   Didn't play my best football ." 

"I know a couple of those throwaways I was scrambling so more of a coverage thing than anything.   I think that they did a good job in coverage    "


Q:Robbie was that was visibly frustrated on the sidelines what in particular might have been frustrated about 
"I’m going to keep that between Robbie and everyone that was involved."


Q:How many of the three picks you think will result of pressure and how much of your overall performance today do you think were the result of pressure in your face?

"I mean I felt like some of those I was holding on the ball too long.   I think that that can also lead to pressure.   So there's a bunch of things that kind of go into it. "
 
Q:How much of adjustment was it for you guys with Taylor moving to the left side and bringing Brady in? 
"I thought T-Mo did a great job over there at least it felt like it, and then Brady I thought did really well at right tackle.   So yeah I thought they did a good job.  There were just a lot of instances where I felt like I was hanging on the ball too long and got to get it out."

"I should have hit that throw where I rolled out to the right. I should hit that throw to Robbie and if who knows what happens after that."
 

 

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Say what you want about Darnold, he doesn't blame anyone else.

That's one thing he always will have over Teddy Asswater at least.

 

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

No one cares what you have to say Sam. Shut up and win next week.

10000% this.     I don't want excuses.  ONLY RESULTS (Positive ones).

Just find a way to win next week (or at least not suck ass like you did today...good lord).

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...