Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At what point do they just have to bench Darnold?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Supbro said:

Lol Fields ain’t helping us win anything this year and it’s still up in the air how good he’s going to be.

He is playing better than Darnold with a shitty line also.  The difference is Fields (in theory) should be much better as the season gets better and the game slows down for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets be clear, Fields is playing as bad and Mac Jones is a 4th round pick at best.

The team clearly wanted Watson and then Stafford, and both ended up unavailable. I mean we had a trade lined up for Stafford and he turned us down.

I imagine will we give up a lot for Watson or Russell Wilson next offseason, the team is really just a franchise QB and a few lineman away from Superbowl contender. Any functioning QB would thrive with these weapons and defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At what point do our receivers start catching the ball? How many drops have we had? Also, when do we get rid of Joe Brady? He abandons the run any chance he gets and loves those long drawn out pass plays no matter the situation. Darnold isn't great, but he isn't terrible either. Minus that one int, he has been alright. If Robby caught some of the balls his way, this game might be trending in a different direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...